dissident right infighting about Trump vs DeSantis - feels like I'm taking crazy pills

posted 1 year ago by TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 1 year ago by TisDaRhythmOfDaNight +53 / -4

prominent figures in the RW sphere are at each other's throats about their favorite candidate.

but why? isn't it exceedingly obvious now that voter fraud is way past the point of no return? what the fuck does it matter which of these is "more likely" to win when an arbitrary number of Democrat votes will materialize at 3AM? just gotta vote harder?

focusing on the candidates is 100% a distraction.

65 comments

65 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (65)

sorted by:

▲ 0 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

I explained this clearly - it was not a decision by the vice president to call the election fraudulent, but to honor the states' LAWFUL DEMANDS that their slate of electoral votes be returned pending an investigation

There was no such demand. Neither the governor, nor the state legislature made such a demand. It is therefore definitely not 'lawful'.

But people here will approve of any comment that screams "FRAUD!!!!" no matter how illogical.

and to use executive power to intercede when the judicial branch was ignoring it's constitutional duty to the state governments.

Yeah, that's completely arbitrary - if that is a valid ground, why didn't Nixon in 1960, Gore in 2000 or Biden in 2016 do it?

The federal serves at the behest of the states, not the other way around.

That's what it was designed to be, but the federal Leviathan definitely has made all the other governments its handmaiden.

You didn't reply because you are wrong

Well, now you're receiving a reply, because I'm in the right and you're in the wrong. You're not just wrong, but you're badly wrong.

and this days later attempt at brushing it off because you can't accept being wrong is beneath the standards you've claimed in the past.

I'd love for nothing more than to be able to PROVE massive electoral fraud in the US. But while I have seen many shenanigans, no smoking gun, nor any indication that whatever fraud there was, was widespread.

I do find it very persuasive that there was a lot of legal shenanigans. I focus on that, rather than wild claims that cannot be substantiated, let alone proven.

The vice president had the duty to refuse to ratify

Where does this 'duty' originate"

because of the states having the right to demand their grievances be addressed.

Already addressed - no state made any such demand.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Hellsbells00 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

And now you're just spewing bullshit. I'm not trawling through years of documents to show you the proof we all saw in 2020 where you clearly weren't paying attention. You also claim that things that happened did not, like state governments protesting and the massive lawsuit that the supreme court chose to ignore on a bullshit ruling (no standing).

There were hours of hearings in state governments like pennsylvania. There was statistical analysis and digital analysis proving fraud and crime. You're on a backup site provided by thedonald and yet you clearly did not actually follow anything going on during that time.

You're not just wrong, you're arrogantly and aggressively wrong. Fix yourself.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

You also claim that things that happened did not, like state governments protesting

Great, then show me even one state government officially protesting, which is what you claimed.

There were hours of hearings in state governments like pennsylvania.

There was no official protest anywhere. I was hoping that the PA legislature would send in an alternative slate of electors, but they didn't.

permalink parent save report block reply