Men don't need help FROM YOU, they need restraining orders from authors like these who want them subservient to them.
If there is a pivot and it's not just a 'did I really do that' trying to feign culpability, it's because they realised the men they neutered can't do anything, they have predators infiltrating all their 'safe spaces' and you've got a growing number of men preferring to be alone with standards than deal with their bs or more....'direct' cultures very willing to deal a backhand if they try the same thing with them.
That's not the same author, and fuck Harvey. He's a rabid, turbo feminist who donates to Planned Parenthood, produces feminist propaganda, and his legal team was a feminist yenta clown car.
So a predator with a full feminist shield? Sounds about right to me.
Also, this is always fear propaganda that gets people to click in anger. Let them all rot in their online cesspool. Last I heard, they are all going to be replaced by AI writers anyways.
What do you make of his legal team being full of feminists? Funny how the one thing that can get you on feminists' side is when they defend Jewish rapists.
This makes no sense. People don't defend their enemies, least of all when need it the most. Again, Weinstein had a long track record of feminism and was card-carrying ADL member. They defended him because they're on the same side.
The "men need help" narrative is hardly new on the left. They've been playing that game for years. That gay MensLib sub is 8 years old and didn't start even start that trend.
That feminist narrative started somewhat shortly after MRA related movements started ruffling some feathers by pointing out a number of ways that men were frequently getting screwed over, both historically and in newer ways in modern society. Probably right after The Red Pill drove feminists into an unfettered rage.
Essentially an attempt to coopt the issues and spin things for their own agenda.
The funny thing about MensLib is that in its early days, it seemed to attract some relatively normal albeit liberal young men. Now it's almost all die hards and full of trannies. The normal people got banned or left in frustration.
You can find examples of both types of articles in both '18 and '23. Looking at one hand-picked article from one year, and another from another, tells us nothing.
I would never, ever claim to know how “women,” like as a whole group comprising half the species, could solve any problem that was special to them. So I won’t credit any men’s “map out of the wilderness” drawn up by a woman.
Men don't need help FROM YOU, they need restraining orders from authors like these who want them subservient to them.
If there is a pivot and it's not just a 'did I really do that' trying to feign culpability, it's because they realised the men they neutered can't do anything, they have predators infiltrating all their 'safe spaces' and you've got a growing number of men preferring to be alone with standards than deal with their bs or more....'direct' cultures very willing to deal a backhand if they try the same thing with them.
That's not the same author, and fuck Harvey. He's a rabid, turbo feminist who donates to Planned Parenthood, produces feminist propaganda, and his legal team was a feminist yenta clown car.
So a predator with a full feminist shield? Sounds about right to me.
Also, this is always fear propaganda that gets people to click in anger. Let them all rot in their online cesspool. Last I heard, they are all going to be replaced by AI writers anyways.
You're making the same argument someone on TD made.
Both articles are WaPo. You have to be living under a rock to not notice the pivot from "men should die" to "men need help".
They want to portray themselves as good allies so that we'll forget what they did to us.
I say fuck them, and fuck the war they want us to fight in, and the spaces they want us to protect. We owe them nothing.
Hollywood got worse after he fell, don't deny it.
A jewish rapist that knows how to keep people in line and make big bucks does better than modern hyperfeminists. Gee, imagine my surprise.
Wasn't a rapist. Women lied.
It was absolutely rape. They withdrew their consent after the fact.
Kek.
What do you make of his legal team being full of feminists? Funny how the one thing that can get you on feminists' side is when they defend Jewish rapists.
President Trump hired a female feminist lawyer to get out of the E Jean Carroll show trial.
Johnny Depp did the same.
You can't defeat the enemy in court, without...the enemy. It's kind of counter-intuitive.
This makes no sense. People don't defend their enemies, least of all when need it the most. Again, Weinstein had a long track record of feminism and was card-carrying ADL member. They defended him because they're on the same side.
I don't understand it either, but it's how it works.
The "men need help" narrative is hardly new on the left. They've been playing that game for years. That gay MensLib sub is 8 years old and didn't start even start that trend.
That feminist narrative started somewhat shortly after MRA related movements started ruffling some feathers by pointing out a number of ways that men were frequently getting screwed over, both historically and in newer ways in modern society. Probably right after The Red Pill drove feminists into an unfettered rage.
Essentially an attempt to coopt the issues and spin things for their own agenda.
Don't forget its retarded little brother BroPill. Testicular shrinkage from excessive soy consumption is totally masculine bro!
The funny thing about MensLib is that in its early days, it seemed to attract some relatively normal albeit liberal young men. Now it's almost all die hards and full of trannies. The normal people got banned or left in frustration.
They’ve always got that explanation ready that “I don’t mean all men, I just mean.. ” or “I don’t mean all white oriole, I just mean…”
I figure if I wanted to refer to a subset of any group, I’d specify that in my initial statement rather than waiting for someone to call me out
It's new to see mainstream media pick it up.
Usually it's online dumping grounds for controlled opposition.
You can find examples of both types of articles in both '18 and '23. Looking at one hand-picked article from one year, and another from another, tells us nothing.
I would never, ever claim to know how “women,” like as a whole group comprising half the species, could solve any problem that was special to them. So I won’t credit any men’s “map out of the wilderness” drawn up by a woman.