This is my guess as well. It's the easiest, most sensical solution for what's actually happening. Like you said, if it was the CEO or somebody, they just wouldn't show the movie at all.
The CEO knows it is happening, he probably supports it via internal memo.
There's a reason he isn't giving the standard "We appreciate the information and we are looking into it." Instead he is going on the attack.
I seriously doubt the low level employees would get away with it unless they had approval from above. This reeks of a conspiracy and the statement from the CEO actually goes a long way to confirming it.
I can only barely remember the last time I went to the theaters, but I don't recall seeing any staff that didn't have danger hair and wasn't covered in tattoos and facial piercings.
If it was someone higher up they could just not show the movie at all. I'm guessing if this isn't just coincidence it's activist employees.
This is my guess as well. It's the easiest, most sensical solution for what's actually happening. Like you said, if it was the CEO or somebody, they just wouldn't show the movie at all.
The CEO knows it is happening, he probably supports it via internal memo.
There's a reason he isn't giving the standard "We appreciate the information and we are looking into it." Instead he is going on the attack.
I seriously doubt the low level employees would get away with it unless they had approval from above. This reeks of a conspiracy and the statement from the CEO actually goes a long way to confirming it.
Yup, this is pretty clearly low level sabotage.
I can only barely remember the last time I went to the theaters, but I don't recall seeing any staff that didn't have danger hair and wasn't covered in tattoos and facial piercings.