Yeah that's far too simpy for my taste. I get that Imp isn't everyone's cup of tea, and his willingness to defend trannies is his worst quality. But there's way too much white knighting for women going on over there, even if the women in question are conservative. Any man who's been in family court knows how quick that shit changes when the prospect of enslaving someone that they've ceased to see as human presents itself. There's a few implicit swipes at MGTOW in there as well, which is retarded if you actually care about making marriage a viable prospect for men again.
Imp was never really wrong in a lot of the broad strokes he talks about, he just takes it well past the point of sanity and then loses everyone. The same way ranting about the Feds doing acts of unconstitutional evil actually does happen, but probably not to the homeless man on the street talking about the microchip.
Ironically, his biggest problem is that he himself is an addict. He is so high off the dopamine rushes he gets for being "right" (its why he always makes sure to post when he was right by predicting obvious things) that he will barrel over any actual substance.
He has no in-group bias for men anymore than feminists. He never even pauses for a moment to do anything positive for men, and most of his "solutions" would hurt men just as much. He just hates feminists and women so much that he holds a "men are suffering" sign to give a small amount of justification to himself.
Like how he defends trannyism even though it's objectively bad for men and feminists love it because he hates the terfs more. I actually wanted to ask him how he feels about Matt Walsh now since Walsh explicitly called out man hating women being the ones pushing Trans shit on their children. Imp always claims he'd never do that
If Imp could drop the tranny loving and admit that men also do dumbshit to support feminism I'd go back to defending his more sensible takes and stop insulting him
It's absolutely apparent men have zero in-group bias towards each other.
That's because collectivism is an inherently feminine trait. Only females and weak males band together. (This is seen in both humans and non-human primates.) As a strong male, why would I bother to expend my efforts lifting up weak males, when they would only serve to be my competition?
T_D has always been a "if you agree with us one time you are now our champion" shithole.
Its why they propelled retards like Candace Owens to stardom, and regularly simp for Congressmen with histories of horror just because they said something right once.
Is he really defending trannies or is that the terfs are worse then them and the only half decent post in that donald link was by MAGA9428 or Imp1's post on JK.
No, he defends trannies even when TERFs have nothing to do with the topic. He went as far as using feminine pronouns for Brett Gay. He seems to think it's a way to oppose the TERFs, but he's just cutting of his nose to spite his face.
The description "pro-men" applies to the women who post and comment on the forum, not conservative women.
"Conservative, decent, and pro men" all apply to "virtually all women here". One adjective doesn't all of the sudden describe another adjective in a sentence.
Yeah that's far too simpy for my taste. I get that Imp isn't everyone's cup of tea, and his willingness to defend trannies is his worst quality. But there's way too much white knighting for women going on over there, even if the women in question are conservative. Any man who's been in family court knows how quick that shit changes when the prospect of enslaving someone that they've ceased to see as human presents itself. There's a few implicit swipes at MGTOW in there as well, which is retarded if you actually care about making marriage a viable prospect for men again.
Imp was never really wrong in a lot of the broad strokes he talks about, he just takes it well past the point of sanity and then loses everyone. The same way ranting about the Feds doing acts of unconstitutional evil actually does happen, but probably not to the homeless man on the street talking about the microchip.
Ironically, his biggest problem is that he himself is an addict. He is so high off the dopamine rushes he gets for being "right" (its why he always makes sure to post when he was right by predicting obvious things) that he will barrel over any actual substance.
He has no in-group bias for men anymore than feminists. He never even pauses for a moment to do anything positive for men, and most of his "solutions" would hurt men just as much. He just hates feminists and women so much that he holds a "men are suffering" sign to give a small amount of justification to himself.
Like how he defends trannyism even though it's objectively bad for men and feminists love it because he hates the terfs more. I actually wanted to ask him how he feels about Matt Walsh now since Walsh explicitly called out man hating women being the ones pushing Trans shit on their children. Imp always claims he'd never do that
If Imp could drop the tranny loving and admit that men also do dumbshit to support feminism I'd go back to defending his more sensible takes and stop insulting him
That's because collectivism is an inherently feminine trait. Only females and weak males band together. (This is seen in both humans and non-human primates.) As a strong male, why would I bother to expend my efforts lifting up weak males, when they would only serve to be my competition?
Dumb as fuck.
T_D has always been a "if you agree with us one time you are now our champion" shithole.
Its why they propelled retards like Candace Owens to stardom, and regularly simp for Congressmen with histories of horror just because they said something right once.
Is he really defending trannies or is that the terfs are worse then them and the only half decent post in that donald link was by MAGA9428 or Imp1's post on JK.
No, he defends trannies even when TERFs have nothing to do with the topic. He went as far as using feminine pronouns for Brett Gay. He seems to think it's a way to oppose the TERFs, but he's just cutting of his nose to spite his face.
He actively defends trannies
The last point is true though
He admits it tho.
I do agree here.
You think this is bad?
Its certainly delusional, thinking that conservative women are "pro-men" any more than other types of women.
The description "pro-men" applies to the women who post and comment on the forum, not conservative women.
"Conservative, decent, and pro men" all apply to "virtually all women here". One adjective doesn't all of the sudden describe another adjective in a sentence.
Yes, virtually all women who post on The Donald. What did you think?
I think we found TheImp's non-schizo alt