How will you know it's not crafted by human hands if it's not barely-edited, mis-spelled drivel?
In fact, from the article:
These trials have already led to a flood of error-laden, plagiarized, and poorly written content due to badly implemented — and, some would argue, inherently unsuited AI models — that still have a strong tendency to make up facts.
Bold of them to assume that doesn't characterise a significant portion of their output already...
The sad thing is I know you're not even exaggerating and people partly only have themselves to blame for hyping up and spamming AI everywhere thinking they're clever when they're fucking not.
Pretty sure AI can make an article that is 95% Twitter and Reddit comments like half of modern articles are, and AI would almost certainly have better grammar in the tiny portion that isn't quotes.
I can't imagine the AI doing any worse.
How will you know it's not crafted by human hands if it's not barely-edited, mis-spelled drivel?
In fact, from the article:
Bold of them to assume that doesn't characterise a significant portion of their output already...
Projecting much? Not necessarily wrong, but still absolutely projecting.
I can imagine it being significantly better.
The sad thing is I know you're not even exaggerating and people partly only have themselves to blame for hyping up and spamming AI everywhere thinking they're clever when they're fucking not.
Hey Journalists-- LEARN TO CODE.
Just learn to prompt, bro.
Uhhhh....about that....
Pretty sure AI can make an article that is 95% Twitter and Reddit comments like half of modern articles are, and AI would almost certainly have better grammar in the tiny portion that isn't quotes.
Let them fight
They should just become truck drivers.