Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

53
Looks like RFK Jr. supports affirmative action. (twitter.com)
posted 3 years ago by onetruephilosoraptor 3 years ago by onetruephilosoraptor +53 / -0
75 comments share
75 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
▲ 24 ▼
– Kienan 24 points 3 years ago +24 / -0

The effects of racist policies going back centuries are now self-perpetuating.

Let's, for the sake of argument, say that's true. Is the answer really to let in blacks at six times the rate of whites, or whatever, when they have the same score?

I wish these people would be open about exactly what it is they're talking about. Exactly who is being affected, both negatively and positively, and if that's fair. It's all well and good to say 'racism bad, we should do something about that,' but that's not what this court case is about. This isn't about diversity. It isn't about racism. Well, it is, but not the main kind (white-on-black) that liberals recognize.

I've heard it so much today. That this is discrimination against blacks, that this is banning them from college, this is segregation. No, this is righting some of the unfair policies that targeted races that on average performed well. It was utter bullshit, deserved to be overturned, and never should have been allowed in the first place.

These cowards need to speak clearly about what it is they're advocating for, and what questions this case actually answered.

This wasn't a referendum on Racism™, this wasn't a referendum on blacks.

It's a sad state of affairs when this lib is at the lowest my third favorite candidate, and the other two also leave varying degrees of sour taste in my mouth. We need better candidates, man. I like Trump, but he's sorta retarded. I respect some of what DeSantis has done, but I think he's snake. I like a few of RFK's takes, and appreciate that he's at least mostly anti-establishment, but he's a lib through-and-through. I want better choices, fuck.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Maskurbator 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Indirectly it was a referendum on blacks because left or right if we're being honest, we know only one group benefitted from it. And why wouldn't they? That's the group it was specifically designed to benefit even if no one ever said it explicitly.

We all know what inner city means. What bad neighborhood means. What "youths" means. The polite euphemisms we create to avoid stating the obvious ugly truth. AA was created to favor blacks and it going away will undo that. But colleges are about to become much safer places.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

AA was created to favor blacks

AA was created to favor Democrats. It is a matter of indifference whether blacks are harmed or benefited by it, as long as all they have can be claimed to be a political favor.

There were some people on social media yesterday denouncing Clarence Thomas for having allegedly benefited from AA and now voting to outlaw it. Because if you ever benefit from AA, even if you didn't ask for it, you are in their debt forever.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– Smith1980 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

And how stupid does it sound to say “I have second rate employees, but my staff is so diverse”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– BidenIsAGroomer 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Is the answer really to let in blacks at six times the rate of whites, or whatever, when they have the same score?

Also - the racist administrators were basically admitting ultra rich Nigerian princes. Not the poor US blacks. Because they cared about the optics, not the country.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TheBroodwich 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

We need better candidates, man. I like Trump, but he's sorta retarded. I respect some of what DeSantis has done, but I think he's snake. I like a few of RFK's takes, and appreciate that he's at least mostly anti-establishment, but he's a lib through-and-through. I want better choices, fuck.

I agree 100%, you just described my views on the current options to a T.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Kienan 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Yup. Only good thing I can say is, at least there are semi-palatable people in both parties this time around; that wasn't really the case last time around. You had Trump, or you had Covidiot Gun Grabbing Authoritarian Dem #XX.

Question is, in the unlikely scenario that neither Trump, DeSantis, or RFK make the ballot...am I writing in Trump, or RFK?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TheBroodwich 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The first time I voted for president, I wrote in Ron Paul :)

I would pull the lever for either Trump or DeSantis without too much pain though. They are speed bumps at least.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GhostBond 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Exactly who is being affected, both negatively and positively

My feeling/experience is that "black americans" are unlikely to be benefiting from these policies in the first place.

Most of the people I've seen benefit are either white women or people who's parents are from other countries - completely uninvolved in the so called "history of discrimination in the us".

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy