I didn’t think of that. If I remember Manson wanted the blacks to win so he could rule them right? I was pretty shocked about the love that Manson got, but then again I read that Bundy got thousands of marriage proposals.
I’ve known some women who get upset when you suggest that women like “bad boys” but there is plenty of evidence to show there is something to that claim
It's indisputably true. All of this makes perfect sense if you understand the basics of evolutionary psychology (you don't need to accept evolution to see the truth of it). A woman needs a man who can protect her and her child. Who can best do that, a weak, quiet guy, or a 'bad boy' - or a guy who has lots of resources and/or high social status?
None of this is conscious. If you asked them, they'd say that they want a sweet guy who cares about them, just like a guy would not say that he loves attractive, young women who are totally insufferable bitches.
the attraction to "bad boys" is because conformity is a proxy for weakness & submission
rebellion is a proxy for strength & independence
women have a genetic impulse to seek out "future alphas" so they can get in on the ground floor then reap the benefits of their man's rise.
"bad boys" are people who reject societal rules & do as they please. these are the kinds of men who historically would become leaders instead of followers later in life.
it is a high-risk high reward mating preference, thus is adopted by ambitious women who feel secure/safe. since society is very good at making women feel safe & protected now with laws & police, the preference towards bad boys has dramatically increased. I guarantee you that women did not prefer bad boys in the 1800s.
women who feel less ambitious & safe/secure prefer competent beta males. and no, not "beta" the way it is used as an insult today, beta in the true sense of being a successful conformist who avoids risk & takes the surest path to success. it's much safer & smarter to be the #2 guy than the #1.
women in older generations rejected alpha bad boys because they correctly feared that their gamble would not pay off & their life would be ruined.
that's not a concern anymore since these same women just figure if their bet goes against them, they'll get a divorce. most of the consequences & risks associated with bad boys don't exist anymore, hence their meteoric rise in popularity in the dating scene in the last 40 years.
As a teen it really confused me because so many women said they wanted a nice sweet guy and then date someone who was the total opposite. Then complain that they couldn’t find good men.
I didn’t think of that. If I remember Manson wanted the blacks to win so he could rule them right? I was pretty shocked about the love that Manson got, but then again I read that Bundy got thousands of marriage proposals.
I’ve known some women who get upset when you suggest that women like “bad boys” but there is plenty of evidence to show there is something to that claim
It's indisputably true. All of this makes perfect sense if you understand the basics of evolutionary psychology (you don't need to accept evolution to see the truth of it). A woman needs a man who can protect her and her child. Who can best do that, a weak, quiet guy, or a 'bad boy' - or a guy who has lots of resources and/or high social status?
None of this is conscious. If you asked them, they'd say that they want a sweet guy who cares about them, just like a guy would not say that he loves attractive, young women who are totally insufferable bitches.
the attraction to "bad boys" is because conformity is a proxy for weakness & submission
rebellion is a proxy for strength & independence
women have a genetic impulse to seek out "future alphas" so they can get in on the ground floor then reap the benefits of their man's rise.
"bad boys" are people who reject societal rules & do as they please. these are the kinds of men who historically would become leaders instead of followers later in life.
it is a high-risk high reward mating preference, thus is adopted by ambitious women who feel secure/safe. since society is very good at making women feel safe & protected now with laws & police, the preference towards bad boys has dramatically increased. I guarantee you that women did not prefer bad boys in the 1800s.
women who feel less ambitious & safe/secure prefer competent beta males. and no, not "beta" the way it is used as an insult today, beta in the true sense of being a successful conformist who avoids risk & takes the surest path to success. it's much safer & smarter to be the #2 guy than the #1.
women in older generations rejected alpha bad boys because they correctly feared that their gamble would not pay off & their life would be ruined.
that's not a concern anymore since these same women just figure if their bet goes against them, they'll get a divorce. most of the consequences & risks associated with bad boys don't exist anymore, hence their meteoric rise in popularity in the dating scene in the last 40 years.
As a teen it really confused me because so many women said they wanted a nice sweet guy and then date someone who was the total opposite. Then complain that they couldn’t find good men.
Women instinctually desire to fuck their conquerors for survival. Serial killers are the modern equivalent.
The term for this is hybristophilia, and as the name suggests it's a paraphilia so trying to understand it can be an effort in futility.