Yes and no. You are saying outliers from the past now explain a common occurrence.

Absolutely not what I meant. I'm saying that any given case of 'died suddenly' is not proof positive that it was caused by the vaccine. Obviously, if such cases double, then it is something that would be very suspicious.

If forest fires happen 3 times a year every year for 80 years then suddenly happen 18 times a year after they change the fire prevention system would you say that is simply just coincidence and use the original data as proof?

Ironically, this is the pro-climate change argument. But interestingly enough, even establishment authorities say that there is no evidence that natural disasters are increasing due to climate change - but the media keeps claiming it anyway.

Trendspotting and forecasting are huge in the insurance industry because that is how they adjust rates. The insurance industry is saying for 'unknown reasons' now there is a much, much higher chance you'll die young and healthy in developed nations.

Is it?

That is a trend, not an outlier. The trends are all showing the same thing: something is killing young healthy people at an untold rate.

I have not seen the trends. Only people posting individual cases, some of which have absolutely nothing to do with any vaccine, some of them from before any vaccine was released, and blaming it all on the thing that they don't like.

If there is such a trend, then the numbers themselves should be discussed, not individual cases.