I just found a new gold mine of point and laugh at the retard material. It's r/datingoverthirty, and of course they ban red pill and MGTOW content, so it's just a bunch of low value feminists jerking each other off. You have to love how all the positives she describes in women are at best irrelevant to male attraction and at worst turn offs, which some of the saner comments further down point out. Those women should be looking for wives instead. There's a limit on the amount of sanity of course, so the tranny jannies running the place locked the thread when too many red pills got dropped. Anyway, quote time:
I went to two events (a group stranger dinner and speed dating) in sf and found mostly awkward males, myself probably included, but also equally lonely and conventionally unattractive woman - you’d think it’d be a good match ha. On the complete other spectrum you had stunning men and woman.
Translation, it's full of men and women of about the same SMV level. But the women don't want the men at their level because they feel entitled to Chad despite being nothing special themselves. The only exceptions are Chads looking for an easy lay, and they're rare because they can get that anywhere.
Advice on Reddit is always "go join a meetup or do a single event". Y'all filled these events up with awkward Reddit dudes and are now complaining.
It's funny because it's true. Only a Faggitor would believe that a guy who's unsuccessful in every other medium just needs to meet more people. Meeting people only works if you're attractive to begin with.
Also, once you're in your late 30s/early 40s, the decent men that are still single by choice don't tend to want to settle down at the same rate that women do at that same age. ... Singles mixers are more geared towards finding a partner than finding a hookup; there will be more decent women there looking for a partner and a bunch of desperate guys looking for... anything. So it will look like a bunch of duds.
In other words the tiny percentage of men that they're actually attracted to are either dating younger women or are just fuckbois. Even the well to do betas are scarce because they've spent the last decade and a half being told how unwanted they are, so they dropped out entirely.
I’m a mid 30s man, who by all definitions would have his shit together. High paying job, my own house, work out, wear ironed clothes that fit when I go out, 5’11, have all my hair, go to therapy.
Lol, get a load of this guy. He starts by describing attributes that would be useful for a beta hunter looking for someone to financially rape, but nothing about attractiveness. Then he says he's 5' 11'', which almost kills his chances of being alphafux on its own since he's just shy of the magic 6' mark. Then he says he goes to therapy, which confirms that he's a retarded simp who believes the obvious horseshit that feminists peddle to get men to go to therapy so they'll be more pliant betas for women to enslave and divorce rape.
Most of the men have not been married, but most of the woman had already been married and had children. This created a mismatch of what the men and women were looking for.
Oh, now we're getting closer to the truth. Women who spent 20 years getting dicked by Chad and Tyrone are desperately hunting for some chump to pay for their bad choices.
This guy gets it. The women at the events might think they're above the men, but on an objective basis they're not. The people who attend those events can't find dates anywhere else, so the men and women are at a similar level. The women will never face this reality because feminism has taught them that dating a sub-Chad is a fate worse than death. And for the crime of not being Chad, the men have to deal with a post wall boss bitch who will take over their life before divorce raping them. The smarter ones in the male group have already dropped out, so the women are left with pathetic losers who have no self respect whatsoever. It serves them right for deciding that being a wife and mother is beneath them.
It's funny because it's true. Only a Faggitor would believe that a guy who's unsuccessful in every other medium just needs to meet more people. Meeting people only works if you're attractive to begin with.
This could work, if you actually do understand your SMV. I know a guy who's a zero, who just married another zero. You do have to meet more people, but you also have to meet people who are actually at your level.
People adore bringing out that one statistical outlier they know - the fat/ugly guy that somehow slays with women and/or has a good relationship.
They're either lying, or
they're ignoring the fact that said guy likely has a metric shitton of social skills to counteract the fact that they're lacking in other departments.
Meeting people is good for polishing social skills, because it's a skill, and skills can be learned, but people rarely phrase it that way - they push it as a cure-all to try and play the odds.
A zero-zero example isn't an outlier, it's normal. People match with similar attractiveness.
I will say, he's good at social skills, and is the most social person in my friend group (I'm actually the objectively worst). She's pretty bad with social skills, but she loves being a woman of simple tastes and joys. She is already unable to be independent as it is for a litany of reasons.
Relationships aren't about what is positions in objective reality. It's just about what you have in reference to the other person. You might have poor social skills as a man, but if they are significantly better than hers, that's a win for her.
Also on the flipside of the coin, it is very rare to find a person who genuinely has no attractive features, like the Elephant Man or something. There are a lot of 5/10 men and women who can be attractive to each other. I think people understand this more the farther you get from major cities.
5/10s also usually understand "I'm not perfect." A major problem once you hit the higher attractiveness setting is that when faced with criticism or asked to adapt, said hottie will simply say "nah I got a line waiting outside for their chance, bye."
Whereas an average person most of the time will be willing to adapt to better fit your side of the coin to compliment and end up more attractive to you for it.
Of course, society has turned even 5/10 girls completely delusional and thereby to reach the level where they are willing to act like an average idiot you need to reach down to the 3/10 level, but that's another issue.
In fairness, it could be a 1:1 or a 1:0 relationship. He's smarter and more social than her. His utility to her is astronomical, compared to what she could do by herself. On the other hand, she genuinely loves him and makes him happy and appreciated, and he wasn't gonna get that from many other people.
It's a win-win for them because you don't have relationships based on objective scores, they are all based on subjectivity and relativity.
I just found a new gold mine of point and laugh at the retard material. It's r/datingoverthirty, and of course they ban red pill and MGTOW content, so it's just a bunch of low value feminists jerking each other off. You have to love how all the positives she describes in women are at best irrelevant to male attraction and at worst turn offs, which some of the saner comments further down point out. Those women should be looking for wives instead. There's a limit on the amount of sanity of course, so the tranny jannies running the place locked the thread when too many red pills got dropped. Anyway, quote time:
Translation, it's full of men and women of about the same SMV level. But the women don't want the men at their level because they feel entitled to Chad despite being nothing special themselves. The only exceptions are Chads looking for an easy lay, and they're rare because they can get that anywhere.
It's funny because it's true. Only a Faggitor would believe that a guy who's unsuccessful in every other medium just needs to meet more people. Meeting people only works if you're attractive to begin with.
In other words the tiny percentage of men that they're actually attracted to are either dating younger women or are just fuckbois. Even the well to do betas are scarce because they've spent the last decade and a half being told how unwanted they are, so they dropped out entirely.
Lol, get a load of this guy. He starts by describing attributes that would be useful for a beta hunter looking for someone to financially rape, but nothing about attractiveness. Then he says he's 5' 11'', which almost kills his chances of being alphafux on its own since he's just shy of the magic 6' mark. Then he says he goes to therapy, which confirms that he's a retarded simp who believes the obvious horseshit that feminists peddle to get men to go to therapy so they'll be more pliant betas for women to enslave and divorce rape.
Oh, now we're getting closer to the truth. Women who spent 20 years getting dicked by Chad and Tyrone are desperately hunting for some chump to pay for their bad choices.
This guy gets it. The women at the events might think they're above the men, but on an objective basis they're not. The people who attend those events can't find dates anywhere else, so the men and women are at a similar level. The women will never face this reality because feminism has taught them that dating a sub-Chad is a fate worse than death. And for the crime of not being Chad, the men have to deal with a post wall boss bitch who will take over their life before divorce raping them. The smarter ones in the male group have already dropped out, so the women are left with pathetic losers who have no self respect whatsoever. It serves them right for deciding that being a wife and mother is beneath them.
This could work, if you actually do understand your SMV. I know a guy who's a zero, who just married another zero. You do have to meet more people, but you also have to meet people who are actually at your level.
People adore bringing out that one statistical outlier they know - the fat/ugly guy that somehow slays with women and/or has a good relationship.
Meeting people is good for polishing social skills, because it's a skill, and skills can be learned, but people rarely phrase it that way - they push it as a cure-all to try and play the odds.
A zero-zero example isn't an outlier, it's normal. People match with similar attractiveness.
I will say, he's good at social skills, and is the most social person in my friend group (I'm actually the objectively worst). She's pretty bad with social skills, but she loves being a woman of simple tastes and joys. She is already unable to be independent as it is for a litany of reasons.
Relationships aren't about what is positions in objective reality. It's just about what you have in reference to the other person. You might have poor social skills as a man, but if they are significantly better than hers, that's a win for her.
Also on the flipside of the coin, it is very rare to find a person who genuinely has no attractive features, like the Elephant Man or something. There are a lot of 5/10 men and women who can be attractive to each other. I think people understand this more the farther you get from major cities.
5/10s also usually understand "I'm not perfect." A major problem once you hit the higher attractiveness setting is that when faced with criticism or asked to adapt, said hottie will simply say "nah I got a line waiting outside for their chance, bye."
Whereas an average person most of the time will be willing to adapt to better fit your side of the coin to compliment and end up more attractive to you for it.
Of course, society has turned even 5/10 girls completely delusional and thereby to reach the level where they are willing to act like an average idiot you need to reach down to the 3/10 level, but that's another issue.
In fairness, it could be a 1:1 or a 1:0 relationship. He's smarter and more social than her. His utility to her is astronomical, compared to what she could do by herself. On the other hand, she genuinely loves him and makes him happy and appreciated, and he wasn't gonna get that from many other people.
It's a win-win for them because you don't have relationships based on objective scores, they are all based on subjectivity and relativity.