Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

50
Notice how they'll never call you wrong, though. Jannies once against proving that Rule 16 is about a single "identity". (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 3 years ago by FutaCumDiet 3 years ago by FutaCumDiet +50 / -0
122 comments download share
122 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (122)
sorted by:
▲ 13 ▼
– Kienan 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Fine. I apologize for making you angry.

I'm at most mildly annoyed by your continual bullshit, but sure.

My issue is that every single one of these "Rule 16" threads is entirely around bad faith arguments

Says you. No one has ever liked R16, from the very beginning. It was always Reddit-tier crap, and didn't belong here. It's still absurd we even have sixteen rules, much less the content in them. Leftists, rightists...people who think they can read minds piss me off, regardless of political affiliation. R16 is bad, criticism of R16 is often warranted.

about how I would never in my life enforce Rule 16 equally because I hate white people and I'm jew.

Way to go to the extreme...

Normally coming from people who explicitly support censorship, hate free expression, and would harass anyone who disagreed with them, going well past the point of telling them to kill themselves.

Ad hominem. Are some of these people hypocrites? Probably. Doesn't change the argument. Again, stop reading into things that aren't there.

What I see from you is the same false claim. That I don't enforce Rule 16 against anything but Jews, despite it literally being a daily question in my life that I actually work at to make sure I enforce equally.

I hope the Hot Pockets are worth it. Also, I never said that, you're once again going to the extremes. I think you might overly enforce it against Da Jews, but I never said exclusively.

My problem is that: "Fuck you, you're just a fucking kike nigger-lover that wants to replace white people, kill yourself." is a really grating response from people who are diametrically opposed to any sort of honest conversation and uncensored. And would be happy putting a bullet in my fucking head after saying that they are not the avatars of white people.

Oh, fucking chill. Once again, going to the extreme. Do you get much of that? Have any of the recent threads been about that? Has the OP in any of the recent threads threatened your life? If yes, provide receipts. If not, it's just more bullshit emotional redirection. Again, we're about free speech. Just be as hands off as possible, and leave your personal shit out of it. Simple.

That is not your response, and you honestly believe your complaint to be true, but it is false.

Again, says you, Mindreader.

I'm speaking in my mod voice because I'm giving explanations to my moderating behavior. It's not a threat.

Never said it was a threat. Said it was weird you saying I was lying, when I'm clearly not.

TL;DR: Chill the fuck out, man.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia [M] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I'm at most mildly annoyed by your continual bullshit

Fine. I apologize anyway.

Way to go to the extreme...

Literally a regular occurrence. Just about every other day or so. Nothing extreme about it.

I think you might overly enforce it against Da Jews, but I never said exclusively.

It's the same base premise: The rule is never enforced equally, despite it being enforced equally.

Again, stop reading into things that aren't there.

I don't have to intentionally be retarded so that I can pretend that I don't understand things that are self-evident. When someone is ideologically possessed, you don't need to read minds, you already know what they think if you know their ideology, especially when they are advocating that ideology or from that ideology.

This is what the NPC meme is about. The ideologically captured are predictable because the ideology is predictable.

Has the OP in any of the recent threads threatened your life?

"Kill yourself" is not a threat.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Kienan 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Fine. I apologize anyway.

I'm doing my own mindreading and deciding it sounded passive aggressive. You apologized for "making me angry," when I criticized you. But, if it was legitimate, sure, thank you.

I don't have to intentionally be retarded so that I can pretend that I don't understand things that are self-evident.

You keep saying that. It's not as compelling as you think it is. Again, why is "nigger" or "fag" allowed? Plenty would consider it "intentionally retarded" to not view those as identity attacks.

I'm not asking you to be retarded. I'm just asking you to be more hands off, as I think some of these enforcements are extremely silly and unnecessary. That's it, that's all there is.

This is what the NPC meme is about. The ideologically captured are predictable because the ideology is predictable.

Aight, people you don't agree with are NPCs, and their opinions can be discarded.

"Kill yourself" is not a threat.

A) Then stop bitching. B) You didn't address my question. Have any of the recent OPs told you to kill yourself, or is this some strawman bullshit?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DomitiusOfMassilia 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I'm doing my own mindreading and deciding it sounded passive aggressive.

Cool. Since that's the way we gotta do this, I'm going to have to go the stoic route. Maybe it serves me right for not being more stoic earlier.

But, if it was legitimate, sure, thank you.

It was and is.

Again, why is "nigger" or "fag" allowed? Plenty would consider it "intentionally retarded" to not view those as identity attacks.

They're not identity attacks, they are slurs. There's a difference in the rules.

B) You didn't address my question. Have any of the recent OPs told you to kill yourself, or is this some strawman bullshit?

Pretty sure something like that is within this thread. But, providing you with receipts would be continuing the issue, "bitching about it", and not "chilling out". If you see it, you see it, if you don't you don't. No reason to focus on it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Kienan 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

It was and is.

Alright, cool. I have no problem with you personally, for the record. I do want you to change some things when it comes to moderation though.

They're not identity attacks, they are slurs.

Yeah, that are used almost exclusively against specific identity groups. And, again, I don't even see the distinction in why one is allowed, and the other isn't. And you haven't made a compelling argument to change my mind.

Pretty sure something like that is within this thread...No reason to focus on it.

I've asked you a few times now. You refuse to answer. Have the OPs in recent threads said you should kill yourself? I don't need "receipts," I just want you to say whether or not you were just talking generally or hyperbolically, or this had actually happened in these instances?

Has u/FutaCumDiet said you should kill yourself? Has u/when_we_win_remember told you to kill yourself?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy