I'm doing my own mindreading and deciding it sounded passive aggressive.
Cool. Since that's the way we gotta do this, I'm going to have to go the stoic route. Maybe it serves me right for not being more stoic earlier.
But, if it was legitimate, sure, thank you.
It was and is.
Again, why is "nigger" or "fag" allowed? Plenty would consider it "intentionally retarded" to not view those as identity attacks.
They're not identity attacks, they are slurs. There's a difference in the rules.
B) You didn't address my question. Have any of the recent OPs told you to kill yourself, or is this some strawman bullshit?
Pretty sure something like that is within this thread. But, providing you with receipts would be continuing the issue, "bitching about it", and not "chilling out". If you see it, you see it, if you don't you don't. No reason to focus on it.
Alright, cool. I have no problem with you personally, for the record. I do want you to change some things when it comes to moderation though.
They're not identity attacks, they are slurs.
Yeah, that are used almost exclusively against specific identity groups. And, again, I don't even see the distinction in why one is allowed, and the other isn't. And you haven't made a compelling argument to change my mind.
Pretty sure something like that is within this thread...No reason to focus on it.
I've asked you a few times now. You refuse to answer. Have the OPs in recent threads said you should kill yourself? I don't need "receipts," I just want you to say whether or not you were just talking generally or hyperbolically, or this had actually happened in these instances?
I've asked you a few times now. You refuse to answer.
You never will. Dude is claiming I posted a quote that "call Jews inherently inferior and trying to destroy civilization" but refuses to share the exact quote. He's full of shit and he knows it.
Slurs are slurs. Identity Attacks are about the larger oppositional dialectic being used.
Well, I'm convinced.
No, wait. I'm not. Why are we suddenly for policing "oppositional dialectic being used?"
[You refuse to answer] Yes, and we're moving on as you suggest, so I'm not bitching about it.
Alright, I'll take that as a big "No, I was just making shit up and talking about people telling me to kill myself, when it was completely irrelevant, and none of the people in question actually told me to kill myself, but I believe they hate Jews, so I'm going to smear them as violent Nazis." Wonderful.
Cool. Since that's the way we gotta do this, I'm going to have to go the stoic route. Maybe it serves me right for not being more stoic earlier.
It was and is.
They're not identity attacks, they are slurs. There's a difference in the rules.
Pretty sure something like that is within this thread. But, providing you with receipts would be continuing the issue, "bitching about it", and not "chilling out". If you see it, you see it, if you don't you don't. No reason to focus on it.
Alright, cool. I have no problem with you personally, for the record. I do want you to change some things when it comes to moderation though.
Yeah, that are used almost exclusively against specific identity groups. And, again, I don't even see the distinction in why one is allowed, and the other isn't. And you haven't made a compelling argument to change my mind.
I've asked you a few times now. You refuse to answer. Have the OPs in recent threads said you should kill yourself? I don't need "receipts," I just want you to say whether or not you were just talking generally or hyperbolically, or this had actually happened in these instances?
Has u/FutaCumDiet said you should kill yourself? Has u/when_we_win_remember told you to kill yourself?
You never will. Dude is claiming I posted a quote that "call Jews inherently inferior and trying to destroy civilization" but refuses to share the exact quote. He's full of shit and he knows it.
I'm not going to change my position on that. Slurs are slurs. Identity Attacks are about the larger oppositional dialectic being used.
Yes, and we're moving on as you suggest, so I'm not bitching about it.
"The conversation is over because I said it's over."
What a fucking reddit mod.
Well, I'm convinced.
No, wait. I'm not. Why are we suddenly for policing "oppositional dialectic being used?"
Alright, I'll take that as a big "No, I was just making shit up and talking about people telling me to kill myself, when it was completely irrelevant, and none of the people in question actually told me to kill myself, but I believe they hate Jews, so I'm going to smear them as violent Nazis." Wonderful.
This is not new. I haven't changed how Rule 16 works.
You have a good day.