Are you really going to say with a straight face that he is right?
Every state that has mail in voting or mostly Democrat 'staff' on hand is compromised. It was an organized process and system fed with millions of dollars and tons of infrastructure.
Since we still don't have and never will have accurate information regarding fraud since no FULL AUDITS were conducted it is entirely possible he won every state.
If you believe that is out of the question than you don't understand math. Until a full audit is done in every state the results of each state are inconclusive.
Every state that has mail in voting or mostly Democrat 'staff' on hand is compromised. It was an organized process and system fed with millions of dollars and tons of infrastructure.
Since we still don't have and never will have accurate information regarding fraud since no FULL AUDITS were conducted it is entirely possible he won every state.
If you believe that is out of the question than you don't understand math. Until a full audit is done in every state the results of each state are inconclusive.
The lack of a full audit means Trump can win all 50 states?
Insane pretzel logic.
Certain states are solidly red and certain states are solidly blue.
The lack of an audit doesn't change existing political trends.
It is stupid shit like this why people don't take actual instances of election fraud seriously.
If you are arguing about AZ, GA and Wi you have a case but arguing about CA and IL means you are delusional.
This would be like the Dems arguing they potentially won West Virginia and Wyoming in the presidential race since there was no audit there.
Dems could argue they won Wyoming and West Virginia since there was no full audit there.
This is a retarded way of thinking.
The lack of an audit doesn't erase decades of political trends.
You are psychotic if you think any R can win statewide in CA and IL.
No R can win those states because Dems outnumber Republicans 2 to 1.
It is simple math.