COVID-19 magnified the polarisation and persistent social, economic, and racial inequities that already existed across US society
Your study is compromised: go directly to jail, do not pass go.
Reading a tad further; who funded this study? The Bill and Melinda Gates foundation funded this study. And they found that vaccination was the only measure that lowered death rates? Shocker...
While it's vaguely amusing that even such a BS study (look at the number of "authors", lol) still can't show lockdowns prevented deaths, it's pretty obvious there's an agenda here:
"Lockdowns, masking, and social distancing only did a little good, but "vaccines" did the most good. In a world where nothing is certain, let our product be the straw you grasp."
I'll also note that this data flies in the face of the data where I live (Canada) where the case, hospitalization and death rates for Covid were all higher in the vaccinated, until Public Health stopped tracking data last year. And, as far as I've seen, we've never resolved the whole "died with/died of" issue, so who really knows anything? I also didn't check, but was the "death rate" the per capita rate, or the number of people who died after testing positive? Because I would expect a lot of Republican voters to stop going to hospitals, unless they were dying, after the mandates came out, while Democrats would be showing up with colds and thus have a lower "death rate", as an example of data manipulation.
Be careful of wolves in sheep's clothing, like this here study. Now is the time they will be writing the history of what happened to suit their purposes.
While vaccines, masking, and restrictions on where people could go were associated with lower infection rates...
It was obvious in 2021 and widely accepted now that the vaccinated were much more infected with covid, per capita, than the unvaccinated. Nothing has ever shown that masks and restrictions significantly reduced infections. Anyone whose bullshit gauge didn't get its needle bent right here, you're a lost sheep in this world. Of course this is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation as weedle pointed out.
only vaccines were associated with a lower death rate
False. Wrong. Lies. Alarm. Excess death calls you a liar.
I suspect this will be the play for a while. Vaccine orthodoxy is their key to pushing medical authoritarianism via the WHO, the Gates Foundation, etc. They are prepared to say anything as long as it salvages some public faith in the vaxx. The endgame will be a situation where they don't need explicit lockdowns at all, since they will be able to neutralise any citizen's ability to travel and transact by freezing the CBDCs in their social credit account, accessible via their vaxxpass.
Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, with enough authors for a softball league; looks like a fix to me, and all these "scientists" want the good boy points from getting their name on it.
It did reduce the number of businesses out there, which was the entire goal. The fewer businesses there are, then it is easier to control the surviving ones.
Your study is compromised: go directly to jail, do not pass go.
Reading a tad further; who funded this study? The Bill and Melinda Gates foundation funded this study. And they found that vaccination was the only measure that lowered death rates? Shocker...
While it's vaguely amusing that even such a BS study (look at the number of "authors", lol) still can't show lockdowns prevented deaths, it's pretty obvious there's an agenda here:
"Lockdowns, masking, and social distancing only did a little good, but "vaccines" did the most good. In a world where nothing is certain, let our product be the straw you grasp."
I'll also note that this data flies in the face of the data where I live (Canada) where the case, hospitalization and death rates for Covid were all higher in the vaccinated, until Public Health stopped tracking data last year. And, as far as I've seen, we've never resolved the whole "died with/died of" issue, so who really knows anything? I also didn't check, but was the "death rate" the per capita rate, or the number of people who died after testing positive? Because I would expect a lot of Republican voters to stop going to hospitals, unless they were dying, after the mandates came out, while Democrats would be showing up with colds and thus have a lower "death rate", as an example of data manipulation.
Be careful of wolves in sheep's clothing, like this here study. Now is the time they will be writing the history of what happened to suit their purposes.
It was obvious in 2021 and widely accepted now that the vaccinated were much more infected with covid, per capita, than the unvaccinated. Nothing has ever shown that masks and restrictions significantly reduced infections. Anyone whose bullshit gauge didn't get its needle bent right here, you're a lost sheep in this world. Of course this is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation as weedle pointed out.
False. Wrong. Lies. Alarm. Excess death calls you a liar.
I suspect this will be the play for a while. Vaccine orthodoxy is their key to pushing medical authoritarianism via the WHO, the Gates Foundation, etc. They are prepared to say anything as long as it salvages some public faith in the vaxx. The endgame will be a situation where they don't need explicit lockdowns at all, since they will be able to neutralise any citizen's ability to travel and transact by freezing the CBDCs in their social credit account, accessible via their vaxxpass.
That will be the same major medical journal that posted Andrew Wakefield's falsified study into the MMR vaccine causing autism.
He never withdrew those allegations about the MMR vaccine. The FDA had a whistleblower come forward and say they knew the same thing :
https://rumble.com/v1x0jwa-vaxxed-the-movie.html
Let's see if they identify how many people were killed by the lockdowns.
Hint: it's a non-zero number.
Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, with enough authors for a softball league; looks like a fix to me, and all these "scientists" want the good boy points from getting their name on it.
It did reduce the number of businesses out there, which was the entire goal. The fewer businesses there are, then it is easier to control the surviving ones.