But better to look at this on a macro level and blame all of
societies women.
Right because the #metoo movement wasn’t “on a macro level”. The UVA gang rape hoax, Mattress Girl, Duke Lacrosse weren’t “on a macro level”. Over and over and over again we see false rape accusations destroy lives, cause suicides, with the accuser facing zero repercussions for their lies.
I'm really concerned that the recent focus on Title IX will bring back the same rules that created the conditions that made all of that possible and the right will allow it because "we need a win against the trannies".
People say you're wrong about things and I don't get it because this is exactly what I expect to happen
I mean the second a troon shot up a school suddenly a bunch of right wingers supported disarming the mentally ill -- you couldn't ask for a better way to get the right to give up 2A
100%, women just stick together as a whole even when wrong. I have barely ever seen one with the balls(no, not nuwomen) to stick up for what is right. Might be because women are generally more "agreeable", especially when it comes to other women.
They also tend to assume that men are doing the same thing anytime they don't pick her side on an issue, regardless of the context or reasoning involved.
Aye, very much so. I imagine much of this draws from some evolutionary developments, IE, where women maybe developed behavioral tendencies in order to give themselves some kind of an edge in the pecking order of early primitive homo sapien groups. And also to help protect themselves a bit from certain forms of aggressive male behavior.
I also seem to recall that in apes, child rearing is often something that multiple females in a group will take an active role in, regardless of familial relations. This could've been sort of the evolutionary starting point that led to a lot of behavioral quirks we see between women today.
The only thing unnatural about in-group bias is that white peoples have been trained not to have any. White women are now viciously tribal along gender lines because they have been denied the racial/ethnic solidarity that is central to every other race/ethnicity.
Women have always been viciously tribal on gender lines. They evolved that way, racial loyalty would be in direct opposition to their chances of survival.
That's the issue most people have with reducing all of the world's ills and faults down to their personal vendettas.
Them being women, them being white, them being liberal, etc., all play a part in each particular result. Without all the pieces it could still happen, but the more pieces you put the more you guarantee it will.
A particularly parroted (among the MRA circles) reddit comment from way back in the day is still as valid now as it was then:
Because the ranks of the self-reported "nice and normal" girls include those systematic life-ruiners.
The problem is not that some have the inclination to, but that all of them have the power to.
Its also a great reminder how much controlling the moderators and throwing shills into a community can do. Because this is literally the science sub from 2009 openly talking about this stuff with someone even backing down once they understand it.
Right because the #metoo movement wasn’t “on a macro level”. The UVA gang rape hoax, Mattress Girl, Duke Lacrosse weren’t “on a macro level”. Over and over and over again we see false rape accusations destroy lives, cause suicides, with the accuser facing zero repercussions for their lies.
I'm really concerned that the recent focus on Title IX will bring back the same rules that created the conditions that made all of that possible and the right will allow it because "we need a win against the trannies".
Not to mention what's been going on in Scotland. Which I can't help but bring up over and over because of just how utterly insane and deranged it is.
Remember when people celebrated Rowling getting Sturgeon's scalp?
Rule 1 of this decade : Don't back the TERFs.
Not just feminists. The DeSimptis wing of the GOP is pushing hard for it.
That bastard must never be President.
People say you're wrong about things and I don't get it because this is exactly what I expect to happen
I mean the second a troon shot up a school suddenly a bunch of right wingers supported disarming the mentally ill -- you couldn't ask for a better way to get the right to give up 2A
Woman A: man's SO
Woman B: someone the man's SO expressly doesn't like
If Woman B asserts a point contradictory to man, however mild, Woman A will take the side of Woman B
I have witnessed this firsthand
100%, women just stick together as a whole even when wrong. I have barely ever seen one with the balls(no, not nuwomen) to stick up for what is right. Might be because women are generally more "agreeable", especially when it comes to other women.
They also tend to assume that men are doing the same thing anytime they don't pick her side on an issue, regardless of the context or reasoning involved.
Aye, very much so. I imagine much of this draws from some evolutionary developments, IE, where women maybe developed behavioral tendencies in order to give themselves some kind of an edge in the pecking order of early primitive homo sapien groups. And also to help protect themselves a bit from certain forms of aggressive male behavior.
I also seem to recall that in apes, child rearing is often something that multiple females in a group will take an active role in, regardless of familial relations. This could've been sort of the evolutionary starting point that led to a lot of behavioral quirks we see between women today.
Evolved behavior = “conspiracy”
The only thing unnatural about in-group bias is that white peoples have been trained not to have any. White women are now viciously tribal along gender lines because they have been denied the racial/ethnic solidarity that is central to every other race/ethnicity.
White men have responded by turning into “women”.
Women have always been viciously tribal on gender lines. They evolved that way, racial loyalty would be in direct opposition to their chances of survival.
That's the issue most people have with reducing all of the world's ills and faults down to their personal vendettas.
Them being women, them being white, them being liberal, etc., all play a part in each particular result. Without all the pieces it could still happen, but the more pieces you put the more you guarantee it will.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
(on women in general due to the last sentence.)
A particularly parroted (among the MRA circles) reddit comment from way back in the day is still as valid now as it was then:
Its also a great reminder how much controlling the moderators and throwing shills into a community can do. Because this is literally the science sub from 2009 openly talking about this stuff with someone even backing down once they understand it.
Archive Link