Even that is an unfair comparison. You need an age adjusted cases per capita, not just per capita.
This is the trick the msm pulled when looking at per capita stats. Florida is a giant retirement village, when your disease basically only hits old frail people, you need to adjust for how many old people a state like florida has compared to others.
Same as sweden, sweden had avoided the last 2-3 years of flu season, but its neighbours were hit. So their stats look worse because of that. The moment you adjust to consider how many old frail people they had going into it, both florida and sweden come out looking even better. And again, the msm never accounts for that.
Needs cases per capita, not overall, otherwise your graph is just going to be "states by capita".
Even that is an unfair comparison. You need an age adjusted cases per capita, not just per capita.
This is the trick the msm pulled when looking at per capita stats. Florida is a giant retirement village, when your disease basically only hits old frail people, you need to adjust for how many old people a state like florida has compared to others.
Same as sweden, sweden had avoided the last 2-3 years of flu season, but its neighbours were hit. So their stats look worse because of that. The moment you adjust to consider how many old frail people they had going into it, both florida and sweden come out looking even better. And again, the msm never accounts for that.