Atlantic: How the Gender Debate Veered Offtrack
(archive.is)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Gender as a “social construct” was made up by literal pedophiles, shall we talk about the reality of Reimer and Money? How about Moneys studies on infant genitalia that were wildly inaccurate and most likely entirely made up? Why is it that almost every other western country is backing down from gender transitioning kids? How is it you use the term transition when there is never a distinct finality to it? Why won’t leftists and social “scientists” actually debate any of this instead of pumping out studies that show absolutely nothing because the data and methodology is so skewed? Is there any proven biological or environmental basis for either trans or gay?
I can't believe the ACLU grouped these together. Thanks for accidentally red pilling people.
Everyone knows that those things are linked.
It was not a debate, it was a monologue. It veered offtrack when it became a debate and people could actually disagree with the nonsense, rather than absorbing what the ruling class throws at us from Mount Olympus.
Many such cases.
Just like all those “important conversations” they insisted we have about race after St. George
Well, so many ways, but one that springs to mind is "gender is just a social construct...so I'm going to cut my tits off to match my 'identity' because I won't conform! Just like all those others!"
It seems like one big troll to me. They know they can get normies to say and do anything to avoid being called bigots. Gender ideology just seems like an experiment to see how far they can take the nonsense before someone points out that the emperor has no clothes. They finally appear to be getting some pushback, but it's not nearly enough. You can tell that this experience of foreign to them because up until now they've been handed what they want on a silver platter and now that they're occasionally being told no their tiny little minds are melting.