Kind of goes with the territory these days, unfortunately…
Hell, even city and town pages have been so corrupted that, in places with some sort of Indigenous population (so, the Americas, Australia, pretty much most of the world outside Europe, in their worldview), half the article will just be about “pre-colonial history”…
It used to be ok. Now it’s awful.
But I just provided that as a “summary”, I guess. Not because I agree with it or think it is accurate, lol…
I mean, unfortunately it’s “Wokeypedia”…
Kind of goes with the territory these days, unfortunately…
Hell, even city and town pages have been so corrupted that, in places with some sort of Indigenous population (so, the Americas, Australia, pretty much most of the world outside Europe, in their worldview), half the article will just be about “pre-colonial history”…
It used to be ok. Now it’s awful.
But I just provided that as a “summary”, I guess. Not because I agree with it or think it is accurate, lol…
Wikipedia is so unfun that only terrible people edit it. Least fun website with comments section ever.
“More historical female heroes” - honestly, there was probably a Wikimedia “event” for that, at some point…
Ironically, the much, much less famous Hatshepsut probably didn’t get the same attention, though… 🤷🏻♂️
As is the way with these things…
Fame. It’s because she’s famous, inc. supposedly for her “beauty” (ironic, considering facial reconstructions)…
That’s literally it, lol.
Not sure how black Hatshepsut was, though. More “brown”, arguably… 🤷🏻♂️