There may be graphene oxide in these injections, but I doubt it. I've seen the actual manufacturing protocol from various released documents, and although some details are still redacted, it's pretty clear there is no step that adds graphene oxide, so if this was to be present it would be unintentional contaminant or intentional addition outside the official protocol; in both cases the "official" documents aren't going to reveal much about this.

I'm just annoyed that people could be so stupid to mistake an electon microscopy sample preparation protocol for the manufacturing protocol for these injections. Even for someone who doesn't know about electron microscopy sample preparation, it's pretty obvious that the protocol in question doesn't refer to manufacture of the injections themselves. But one mention of the word "graphene oxide" and "OMG! I saw the word graphene oxide in a document released by Pfizer! This must mean it is really in the shots!" and we have bullshit headlines like "Pfizer Confirms Via FOIA Graphene Oxide in the Clot Shots".