From your other comments in this thread, you seem to just want some sort of autocracy and throw out "monarchy" as a generic substitute for autocracy. But monarchy is a very specific thing, and its key feature is hereditary succession. (I say the same thing to the leftist retards who flippantly throw around the term "fascism" without understanding a damn thing about what the key features of a fascist political system actually are.) The fundamental flaw of monarchy is that eventually monarchs realize that they can concentrate power by fucking their cousins, siblings, and aunt/uncles. And that's what I mean by inbred retard. See the Habsburgs.

So my question to you is why monarchy specifically? And what form, an absolute monarchy, constitutional monarchy, devolved monarchy, or something else? And why not another form of autocracy, like a military dictatorship? Or an undemocratic oligarchy?