These are too easy. Since sodomy includes anal and oral acts, given three people, it's not even hard to have the same person involved in sodomy and sex simultaneously.
Nice try, but sodomy doesn’t include vaginal sex. So try again? You couldn’t do “gay” without redefining it and now are trying the same with sodomy and had to even try to add a third party.
No one said it did? But a woman who has anal is a sodomite. She's still capable of having vaginal sex. Therefore, a sodomite can have sex.
Under that broad view of sodomy it not only includes anal but bestiality, necrophilia, etc. it once again requires the person to not only engage in sodomy but also sexual reproduction, which again makes the individual not exclusively a sodomite per your argument. This is again the same as saying a “gay” person could impregnate a female but would not in itself be a gay act or fit in the definition of what is considered a “gay” person.
Nice try, but sodomy doesn’t include vaginal sex. So try again? You couldn’t do “gay” without redefining it and now are trying the same with sodomy and had to even try to add a third party.
Under that broad view of sodomy it not only includes anal but bestiality, necrophilia, etc. it once again requires the person to not only engage in sodomy but also sexual reproduction, which again makes the individual not exclusively a sodomite per your argument. This is again the same as saying a “gay” person could impregnate a female but would not in itself be a gay act or fit in the definition of what is considered a “gay” person.
Which brings us back to find a definition of gay that doesn’t involve the slang use of sex, otherwise we have it as just a choice