Asking people is how you get retarded answers like emotional availability being the most important factor. The other thing is that even a study that tracked what kind of men the women actually end up with would be flawed simply because they aren't enough men that they find attractive to go around.
Dating is a maths probability problem, the highest concentration of women is going to be in universities and extremely cushy office jobs where the rest of the men aren't, women are just never going to find a partner in that environment because they're so isolated from other men.
The only types of men they're going to come into contact with are extremely left wing men at best, so every study is going to be completely flawed because these researchers won't ever go outside. If these researchers went and asked a bunch of construction workers what they thought of the average western millennial woman they'd probably faint from shock.
I've been doing the maths quite a bit on this type of thing myself and it's fascinating and depressing at the same time.
It's also a complete fucking lie, western women are absolutely brutal now in how much they dismiss men they don't think are 'good looking'. You could have a simply slightly below good looking guy that doesn't look like a model or anything but works out and is fine and they will fucking dismiss them even if they'd end up a really good match because these psychos think they deserve a CEO billionaire with abs and it's not even a joke meme anymore.
It's all over social media now and you can practically trip over studies that show that on every damn dating site women always go for 5% - 10% of men and ignore the rest because they overestimate their own worth big time. Largely thanks to feminist propaganda brainwashing them all into thinking they're perfect angels. Which also might explain why when I went on tinder ages ago I saw nothing but every woman doing those stupid fucking angel wing poses against this brick wall like they were special.
The incel subculture can be characterized as a “fatalistic , misogynistic echo-chamber in which misery and failure are celebrated” and is emblematic of all dimensions of the victimhood-mindset
This really fucking gets me, these academics are writing complete nonsense and clearly don't live in the real world. Incel literally means 'involuntarily celibate' and you see what incels write it's clear just glancing over their page they just believe they're too ugly to get laid in a lot of cases and don't get female attention. Feminists ( And I know these are feminists writing this ) then take the fact that they're not automatically worshipping the ground women walk on as 'misogyny'.
William Costello graduated with an MSc in Psychology, Culture, and Evolution from Brunel University London.
Oh I fucking hate universities with a passion and of course there it is! Some London educated twat who's decided he's the foremost authority on Incel ideology.
Lol, you can't determine this from just asking people, you academic retards.
Asking people is how you get retarded answers like emotional availability being the most important factor. The other thing is that even a study that tracked what kind of men the women actually end up with would be flawed simply because they aren't enough men that they find attractive to go around.
Dating is a maths probability problem, the highest concentration of women is going to be in universities and extremely cushy office jobs where the rest of the men aren't, women are just never going to find a partner in that environment because they're so isolated from other men.
The only types of men they're going to come into contact with are extremely left wing men at best, so every study is going to be completely flawed because these researchers won't ever go outside. If these researchers went and asked a bunch of construction workers what they thought of the average western millennial woman they'd probably faint from shock.
I've been doing the maths quite a bit on this type of thing myself and it's fascinating and depressing at the same time.
You don't ask a fish how to catch it.
It's also a complete fucking lie, western women are absolutely brutal now in how much they dismiss men they don't think are 'good looking'. You could have a simply slightly below good looking guy that doesn't look like a model or anything but works out and is fine and they will fucking dismiss them even if they'd end up a really good match because these psychos think they deserve a CEO billionaire with abs and it's not even a joke meme anymore.
It's all over social media now and you can practically trip over studies that show that on every damn dating site women always go for 5% - 10% of men and ignore the rest because they overestimate their own worth big time. Largely thanks to feminist propaganda brainwashing them all into thinking they're perfect angels. Which also might explain why when I went on tinder ages ago I saw nothing but every woman doing those stupid fucking angel wing poses against this brick wall like they were special.
This really fucking gets me, these academics are writing complete nonsense and clearly don't live in the real world. Incel literally means 'involuntarily celibate' and you see what incels write it's clear just glancing over their page they just believe they're too ugly to get laid in a lot of cases and don't get female attention. Feminists ( And I know these are feminists writing this ) then take the fact that they're not automatically worshipping the ground women walk on as 'misogyny'.
Oh I fucking hate universities with a passion and of course there it is! Some London educated twat who's decided he's the foremost authority on Incel ideology.
> a segment of men hated by women
> "women most affected"
This is why people say "don't listen to what they say, watch what they do" or more succinctly "actions speak louder than words".
It's all part of the "manosphere is wrong about everything" narrative that has started spreading for about a month or so.