Obvious answer: institutional backing.
But I wonder why troons succeeded in garnering this kind of support while furries failed. I pull a complete blank on why. If anything, the ridiculousness of denying one's own gender is just as ridiculous as denying one's own species.
The similarities are uncanny:
- Origins in the pride/gay rights bullshit
- Delusions of self: "I am not what I am, I am what I imagine."
- Cluster effect: exposure to trannies creates trannies, just like exposure to furries creates furries.
- Insufferable personalities and overbearing self-inserting into normal spaces.
- Claiming negative reactions of the previous point as prosecution. "Literal Trans Genocide" vs "Fursecution"
- Expensive conversion to one's perfect form: Chopadickectomy vs full body Fursuit.
- Abject degenerate sexual tendencies with zero self restraint
- Subversive even to the concept of normality, seemingly proud to be a deviant.
- Riddled with mental illness: anxiety, depression, prone to violence
As you say, institutional backing is the big one.
But I think the secondary one is the whole furry thing is clearly a fetish, whereas the trans thing is easier to sell to normies as a continuation of the whole 'gay+' thing. It's easier to talk people into accepting that someone 'changing their gender' is 'being their true self' than it is to convince people that...all that furry shit is 'true self' stuff.
It's optics. Trans shit is bizarre, but I can see why they've convinced NPCs that it's gay-adjacent, and a human right, and all that.
The entire thing for gays it was that they are born that way, hence there is no choice in the matter. They are claiming the same with trans and is a bit harder to sell then gays but I can see making it work. It all plays in to sympathy.
I just can't see getting off by wearing a giant stuffed animal as a "born that way" thing.
Yeah but there's no actual evidence gays are "born that way" -- But there's a lot of evidence that homosexuality is acquired environmentally (abuse, media, chemicals)
98.5% of “trans females” are mentally ill homosexuals (but I repeat myself)
https://archive.ph/8xB8W
That number seems higher than I'd expect for the remaining 1.5% to include all the Chris Chan types who are using it as a bludgeon to get women/lesbians to sleep with.
The 1.5% includes a lot of “normal” people who you’d never realize by looking at them, but they have some genetic or developmental abnormality which transsexualizes them (androgyne disorders, chromosomal disorders, overexposure to hormone analogues/mimics during gestation, etc).
For example, the “womens” events in the Olympics have a long history of such types:
https://www.insider.com/intersex-olympic-athletes-barred-from-competing-in-preferred-olympic-event-2021-7
Imo, from what little I know of that Chris retard, he is all kinds of mentally ill
Let me give you a hint:
You’re the first one in a direct, unbroken line of ancestor and descendant lasting ~3,000,000,000 years to decide “nah I like being a hedonistic degenerate more”