Yeah, I saw this yesterday. What strikes me is how many women are choosing to be single mothers on purpose. It's one thing to be delusional enough to think that Chad will stick around but quite another to deliberately choose that path. I suppose she realized that she would never lock down the high income Chad she feels entitled to and went this route because the thought of some icky beta having even the illusion of rights to his child that the law theoretically grants him is so enraging to her.
I suppose it's less about them choosing to be single mothers and more about them going about it in a way that doesn't allow them to leech off the father. I posted about a similar situation earlier this year. Typically the child is an excuse to extort a meal ticket out of the father in addition to daddy government. They're willingly giving up a paycheck by going this route (not I would trust the family courts not to financially rape sperm donors regardless of the law). That's why I speculate that they do this because even pretending that the father has rights (that the family courts regularly disregard) is just too much for these entitled cunts. It comes way too close to acknowledging that men (especially betas) are human for their comfort.
"And although I planned to raise our child on my own, my friend wanted to remain involved as a family member, attending birthday parties and school graduations, offering advice and an occasional shoulder to cry on. Someone to love my child fully and without condition, as I would."
She found her perfect beta with her faggot friend. Why do you think she probably chose this guy in the first place. She knew she would be able to sponge off of him with no obligation. This is every feminists wet dream.
My understanding is that he wouldn't owe child support because he's a donor and not the legal father. Not that I'd trust a family court to ever rule against a woman as I mentioned above. The upside for her is that he also lacks the nominal authority over the child that the law pretends that fathers have. He probably would let her mooch off him on a voluntary basis, which might be what you're getting at.
Probably no child support, but sounds like he'd be either outright paying for or at least significantly contributing to the parties and all the extras like presents that aren't strictly necessary.
They could have just 'copulated' the old fashioned way. Or used a turkey baster, which they claim is effective, if the old fashioned way was really too 'icky'. Those are the affordable ways of getting pregnant if you're into this alternative lifestyle stuff as a feminist.
I'm thinking they went the IVF route because the gay guy didn't want to be legally and financially responsible for the aftermath. Or the grey chick wanted to hold all the legal cards and didn't want the gay guy to have any legal claims to the child.
She's portraying herself as benevolent and sympathetic, but there is always a cynical undercurrent running underneath with these types. And when you confront them with it, they become indignant and outraged.
Yeah but I mean did they try to have sex? Or any low tech "IVF" methods? Actually I don't get how IVF could transmit HIV, but I guess sex could. The whole thing is confusing.
Stupid fag-hag is so delusional. IVF itself has low success rates and she was already in her 40's when attempting it. These IVF clinics are making bank off of idiotic feminists.
Yeah, I saw this yesterday. What strikes me is how many women are choosing to be single mothers on purpose. It's one thing to be delusional enough to think that Chad will stick around but quite another to deliberately choose that path. I suppose she realized that she would never lock down the high income Chad she feels entitled to and went this route because the thought of some icky beta having even the illusion of rights to his child that the law theoretically grants him is so enraging to her.
Why wouldn't they?
If she's got a kid, daddy government will give her a free roof over her head.
I suppose it's less about them choosing to be single mothers and more about them going about it in a way that doesn't allow them to leech off the father. I posted about a similar situation earlier this year. Typically the child is an excuse to extort a meal ticket out of the father in addition to daddy government. They're willingly giving up a paycheck by going this route (not I would trust the family courts not to financially rape sperm donors regardless of the law). That's why I speculate that they do this because even pretending that the father has rights (that the family courts regularly disregard) is just too much for these entitled cunts. It comes way too close to acknowledging that men (especially betas) are human for their comfort.
"And although I planned to raise our child on my own, my friend wanted to remain involved as a family member, attending birthday parties and school graduations, offering advice and an occasional shoulder to cry on. Someone to love my child fully and without condition, as I would."
She found her perfect beta with her faggot friend. Why do you think she probably chose this guy in the first place. She knew she would be able to sponge off of him with no obligation. This is every feminists wet dream.
My understanding is that he wouldn't owe child support because he's a donor and not the legal father. Not that I'd trust a family court to ever rule against a woman as I mentioned above. The upside for her is that he also lacks the nominal authority over the child that the law pretends that fathers have. He probably would let her mooch off him on a voluntary basis, which might be what you're getting at.
Probably no child support, but sounds like he'd be either outright paying for or at least significantly contributing to the parties and all the extras like presents that aren't strictly necessary.
It's the only way they will ever feel even a small semblance of being a true woman which includes being a wife and mother.
They could have just 'copulated' the old fashioned way. Or used a turkey baster, which they claim is effective, if the old fashioned way was really too 'icky'. Those are the affordable ways of getting pregnant if you're into this alternative lifestyle stuff as a feminist.
I'm thinking they went the IVF route because the gay guy didn't want to be legally and financially responsible for the aftermath. Or the grey chick wanted to hold all the legal cards and didn't want the gay guy to have any legal claims to the child.
She's portraying herself as benevolent and sympathetic, but there is always a cynical undercurrent running underneath with these types. And when you confront them with it, they become indignant and outraged.
Fortunately her uterus took its cue from the Big Guy upstairs rather than the tumour behind her eyes.
She had an issue getting pregnant with the fag I guess? Or did they try?
However accidental this heterosexual couple, all they'd have to do is get married to get any kind of fertility treatment they want.
They test for STDs. He kept failing because he was still within the window of positives. I'm assuming he has HIV.
Yeah but I mean did they try to have sex? Or any low tech "IVF" methods? Actually I don't get how IVF could transmit HIV, but I guess sex could. The whole thing is confusing.
Stupid fag-hag is so delusional. IVF itself has low success rates and she was already in her 40's when attempting it. These IVF clinics are making bank off of idiotic feminists.