My understanding is that he wouldn't owe child support because he's a donor and not the legal father. Not that I'd trust a family court to ever rule against a woman as I mentioned above. The upside for her is that he also lacks the nominal authority over the child that the law pretends that fathers have. He probably would let her mooch off him on a voluntary basis, which might be what you're getting at.
Probably no child support, but sounds like he'd be either outright paying for or at least significantly contributing to the parties and all the extras like presents that aren't strictly necessary.
My understanding is that he wouldn't owe child support because he's a donor and not the legal father. Not that I'd trust a family court to ever rule against a woman as I mentioned above. The upside for her is that he also lacks the nominal authority over the child that the law pretends that fathers have. He probably would let her mooch off him on a voluntary basis, which might be what you're getting at.
Probably no child support, but sounds like he'd be either outright paying for or at least significantly contributing to the parties and all the extras like presents that aren't strictly necessary.