You cite the worst sources. That's not an ad hominem. Wikipedia, the New York Times, then you cited an Italian actor's ravings about Russia, and now this lowlife.
Of course a guy with the regime's flag in his username is going to support the regime.
I don't need to background check people who post to independent data sources because their background doesn't matter. It's irrelevant.
People's credibility matters a great deal.
Folks with rainbow usernames don't have credibility when it comes to economics. Nor do Italian actors have credibility when it comes to international affairs.
He literally posted sources and charts
Ah, GDP charts.
Funny thing is, GDP charts show my country getting richer and richer, and yet everyone keeps getting poorer.
It doesn't matter if he's a faggot. It's irrelevant to his point. Learn how argument works.
I don't put much stock in the judgment of people who can't tell women apart from men. In this case, he is literally wearing the regime's flag, so why on earth would you think that his defense of the regime is in any way made in good faith, or is reliable?
You cite the worst sources. That's not an ad hominem. Wikipedia, the New York Times, then you cited an Italian actor's ravings about Russia, and now this lowlife.
Of course a guy with the regime's flag in his username is going to support the regime.
I don't need to background check people who post to independent data sources because their background doesn't matter. It's irrelevant.
He literally posted sources and charts: https://twitter.com/JosephPolitano/status/1638379679781474304
It doesn't matter if he's a faggot. It's irrelevant to his point. Learn how argument works.
People's credibility matters a great deal.
Folks with rainbow usernames don't have credibility when it comes to economics. Nor do Italian actors have credibility when it comes to international affairs.
Ah, GDP charts.
Funny thing is, GDP charts show my country getting richer and richer, and yet everyone keeps getting poorer.
I don't put much stock in the judgment of people who can't tell women apart from men. In this case, he is literally wearing the regime's flag, so why on earth would you think that his defense of the regime is in any way made in good faith, or is reliable?