I think it's a chick, considering it's referred to as "trans brother."
Then again, you can never tell when there are infinite genders. Could be a dude who 'feels' like a trans dude, who the fuck knows anymore. But I'm thinking this is a girl.
The contract itself is total cringe, I don't think we should be celebrating this behaviour but equally that doesn't mean we can't call out the redditors for being retards. People make the mistake of thinking any of this is a two choice situation, we can always tell both sides to fuck off no matter how they may think otherwise. Parents should just have the balls to issue an ultimatum if the redditor is being a massive cunt.
I mean it is, but they could have just equally said "Behave normally or we're kicking you out" and that would have been the end of it. Being a centrist, when I see the two sides behaving in an equally cringe SJW manner, I do feel like I have to call it out. It's even worse when you see people you otherwise would respect cheering that sort of cringe on.
I also feel as well with regards to this kind of scenario it's a classic example of people posting too much of their private lives on social media and the 'not your army' rule very much applies here with regards to the internet. The only people who seriously would want to get involved in this dumb shit are trans groomers.
internet has very much often become the next reality TV show for spergs to get attention on and when you actually look closer at what's going on versus how it's presented by certain factions you realise everyone in this situation is making themselves look like shit heads.
If they just said "behave normally" that would invite all sorts of debate and BS justification which they've likely already gone through. If I was dealing with a tranny at close range, I would also want things laid out clearly.
This is a lot less pedantic than any actual rental agreement would be and, considering the deal being offered, not at all unreasonable.
There is no way this is their first attempt, so your methodology probably already failed multiple times which brought them to this point. Wherein they are trying something extreme to hopefully change something.
Especially as a literal contract is a physical object, instead of a nebulous conversation you can pretend you forget, with specifics specifically laid out you agree to follow, instead of a vague "normal" they can argue the definition of. Its cringe, but raising kids is filled with cringe shit you have to do at times.
It looks like the contract addresses specific behaviors that she was engaging in that made the household a toxic hellhole. As another poster said when you're dealing with a tranny you can't just give vague expectations because they'll lawyer the hell out of them and find any way they possibly can to be an insufferable asshole. Trannies poison everything. It's in their nature. The parents are being too generous for their own good. The easy and sane thing would be the kick the tranny to the curb and only allow her back if she decides to act like a human.
Edit: Removed something that was based on a misreading.
I don't think so.
1 is just "Hey, we are Christians, don't insult us & our religion while we are present". I think that's fine.
"Don't manipulate your siblings with those thoughts" - depending on how old those siblings are - fine.
"Don't bring in occult stuff into the home" is basically an extension of 1, or the parents would "randomly" find ton of stuff in their home which the troon just "forgot" to put away properly (read: intentionally insulting the parents' belief).
The troon is to believe, practice and say whatever it wants. Just not in their parent's home & in front of their siblings.
Yeah, reading it again I realize that I mentally detached the first sentence from the more specific stuff, so it felt more like a value statement that could have been left out. I don't take issue with the specific requirements that require actions or omissions on the part of the troon, and now I'm realizing that those requirements were just making the first sentence more specific, which is fine. Religious people are free to disassociate themselves from people who shit all over their beliefs out of spite as their tranny daughter was surely doing.
So based on item 6, the dude is literally going to college on his parents' dime, and saving even the money that would be spent on rent.
I bet the comments are all assuming he's 13.
I think it's a chick, considering it's referred to as "trans brother."
Then again, you can never tell when there are infinite genders. Could be a dude who 'feels' like a trans dude, who the fuck knows anymore. But I'm thinking this is a girl.
The contract itself is total cringe, I don't think we should be celebrating this behaviour but equally that doesn't mean we can't call out the redditors for being retards. People make the mistake of thinking any of this is a two choice situation, we can always tell both sides to fuck off no matter how they may think otherwise. Parents should just have the balls to issue an ultimatum if the redditor is being a massive cunt.
I'd say this is the ultimatum, just in a bit of a cringey format.
I mean it is, but they could have just equally said "Behave normally or we're kicking you out" and that would have been the end of it. Being a centrist, when I see the two sides behaving in an equally cringe SJW manner, I do feel like I have to call it out. It's even worse when you see people you otherwise would respect cheering that sort of cringe on.
I also feel as well with regards to this kind of scenario it's a classic example of people posting too much of their private lives on social media and the 'not your army' rule very much applies here with regards to the internet. The only people who seriously would want to get involved in this dumb shit are trans groomers.
internet has very much often become the next reality TV show for spergs to get attention on and when you actually look closer at what's going on versus how it's presented by certain factions you realise everyone in this situation is making themselves look like shit heads.
Disagree.
If they just said "behave normally" that would invite all sorts of debate and BS justification which they've likely already gone through. If I was dealing with a tranny at close range, I would also want things laid out clearly.
This is a lot less pedantic than any actual rental agreement would be and, considering the deal being offered, not at all unreasonable.
There is no way this is their first attempt, so your methodology probably already failed multiple times which brought them to this point. Wherein they are trying something extreme to hopefully change something.
Especially as a literal contract is a physical object, instead of a nebulous conversation you can pretend you forget, with specifics specifically laid out you agree to follow, instead of a vague "normal" they can argue the definition of. Its cringe, but raising kids is filled with cringe shit you have to do at times.
It looks like the contract addresses specific behaviors that she was engaging in that made the household a toxic hellhole. As another poster said when you're dealing with a tranny you can't just give vague expectations because they'll lawyer the hell out of them and find any way they possibly can to be an insufferable asshole. Trannies poison everything. It's in their nature. The parents are being too generous for their own good. The easy and sane thing would be the kick the tranny to the curb and only allow her back if she decides to act like a human.
Edit: Removed something that was based on a misreading.
I don't think so.
1 is just "Hey, we are Christians, don't insult us & our religion while we are present". I think that's fine.
"Don't manipulate your siblings with those thoughts" - depending on how old those siblings are - fine.
"Don't bring in occult stuff into the home" is basically an extension of 1, or the parents would "randomly" find ton of stuff in their home which the troon just "forgot" to put away properly (read: intentionally insulting the parents' belief).
The troon is to believe, practice and say whatever it wants. Just not in their parent's home & in front of their siblings.
Yeah, reading it again I realize that I mentally detached the first sentence from the more specific stuff, so it felt more like a value statement that could have been left out. I don't take issue with the specific requirements that require actions or omissions on the part of the troon, and now I'm realizing that those requirements were just making the first sentence more specific, which is fine. Religious people are free to disassociate themselves from people who shit all over their beliefs out of spite as their tranny daughter was surely doing.
treating the offspring as a guest in the home is better than treating them as a child, I guess.
Exactly, the Amish do it right with the shunning. Want out? Then stay out.