Generally, any white on X "racism" isn't unreasonable or phobic these days, but learned fear/dislike.
There is a difference between "I don't like blacks because they eat all the fried chicken" and "I avoid blacks because they constantly rob me." Yet the media and everyone else treats them like one in the same, to keep up the supply of "racism" for their constant demand.
I wouldn't say that. I'd say most black racism in America is genuinely phobia. "White people are out to fucking kill me. Every cop is out to kill me. White people literally conspire together to figure out how to kill us as a race."
"White people literally don't think about you."
"No no no no, all whites have racial solidarity, stronger than what blacks have. Police officers kill 14,000 unarmed blacks a year [sic]. You're a race of criminals who invented racism, violence, and theft. You hate us, and you kill us, so I fucking hate you."
I call them Black National Socialists for a reason. Their racial narrative is just as conspiratorial as any NatSoc is with jews, and frankly, many American blacks also share the same views on jews.
any white on X "racism" isn't unreasonable or phobic these days
that's a self-defeating argument to make. you're tacitly accepting their framing that white on X "racism" is even a thing, which statistics consistently show is not true when compared to the prevalence of such acts among other ethnicities
I lived in one of the few places where black people actually are part of the population, instead of "that one part of town."
Its absolutely a thing, it just doesn't happen much and really never matters. Pretending it doesn't exist at all defeats your argument even quicker by giving them an easy hole to poke.
okay, seems like I didn't communicate that very well. yeah, acts of racism among whites absolutely exist (exhibit A: the main page of this forum). the problem is with the claim that they're common enough and harmful enough as to be a problem. much of the left's public policy relies on that being true, to the point that they're faking hate crimes. I think it's vital to push back against that claim.
I just don't think "yes you're damn right we're violent and that's a good thing" is the right response here. that doesn't mean we need to shy away from highlighting black criminality - on the contrary. I think the right response is more like, "despite black criminality, whites are relative saints"
Humans aren't good at relativity, especially after an emotional response has already happened. Which is why despite blacks being the common element, we can't ignore the white ones happening even if its rare enough to not even be a statistical blip.
You have to preempt their argument by knowing what they will bring up and have already addressed and dismissed it. Which is kind of what Clot Adams was doing, but poorly. Explaining why it happens quietly and simply so that it can be dismissed when they try to use it.
Generally, any white on X "racism" isn't unreasonable or phobic these days, but learned fear/dislike.
There is a difference between "I don't like blacks because they eat all the fried chicken" and "I avoid blacks because they constantly rob me." Yet the media and everyone else treats them like one in the same, to keep up the supply of "racism" for their constant demand.
I wouldn't say that. I'd say most black racism in America is genuinely phobia. "White people are out to fucking kill me. Every cop is out to kill me. White people literally conspire together to figure out how to kill us as a race."
"White people literally don't think about you."
"No no no no, all whites have racial solidarity, stronger than what blacks have. Police officers kill 14,000 unarmed blacks a year [sic]. You're a race of criminals who invented racism, violence, and theft. You hate us, and you kill us, so I fucking hate you."
I call them Black National Socialists for a reason. Their racial narrative is just as conspiratorial as any NatSoc is with jews, and frankly, many American blacks also share the same views on jews.
That's for black on X racism, mine was only for white on X.
Blacks have their own industry entirely built to make them think that way.
There's a huge amount of irrationality to it
that's a self-defeating argument to make. you're tacitly accepting their framing that white on X "racism" is even a thing, which statistics consistently show is not true when compared to the prevalence of such acts among other ethnicities
I lived in one of the few places where black people actually are part of the population, instead of "that one part of town."
Its absolutely a thing, it just doesn't happen much and really never matters. Pretending it doesn't exist at all defeats your argument even quicker by giving them an easy hole to poke.
okay, seems like I didn't communicate that very well. yeah, acts of racism among whites absolutely exist (exhibit A: the main page of this forum). the problem is with the claim that they're common enough and harmful enough as to be a problem. much of the left's public policy relies on that being true, to the point that they're faking hate crimes. I think it's vital to push back against that claim.
I just don't think "yes you're damn right we're violent and that's a good thing" is the right response here. that doesn't mean we need to shy away from highlighting black criminality - on the contrary. I think the right response is more like, "despite black criminality, whites are relative saints"
Humans aren't good at relativity, especially after an emotional response has already happened. Which is why despite blacks being the common element, we can't ignore the white ones happening even if its rare enough to not even be a statistical blip.
You have to preempt their argument by knowing what they will bring up and have already addressed and dismissed it. Which is kind of what Clot Adams was doing, but poorly. Explaining why it happens quietly and simply so that it can be dismissed when they try to use it.
I wish you were wrong about that but I understand exactly what you mean.