The warrant request omitted a central part of the FBI’s plan: permanent confiscation of everything inside any box containing at least $5,000 in cash or goods, a senior FBI agent recently testified.
So that's called perjury on the part of the agent that swore out the warrant application. But that's OK because:
The omission had no bearing on whether Kim found probable cause to seize the company’s business equipment, so it was “immaterial” to the warrant request, Klausner found.
So, fucking idiot judge says it's OK that the FBI lied to a different judge about what it planned to seize and why, because there warrant was valid for the search they said they were going to conduct (but did something else instead).
Honestly the solution to this violates forum rules, but it's an effective and permanent way to stop evil people from doing evil things.
2nd link is paywalled. Try this: https://12ft.io/proxy?&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.latimes.com%2Fcalifornia%2Fstory%2F2022-09-30%2Fjudge-backs-fbi-beverly-hills-safe-deposit-box-raid
So that's called perjury on the part of the agent that swore out the warrant application. But that's OK because:
So, fucking idiot judge says it's OK that the FBI lied to a different judge about what it planned to seize and why, because there warrant was valid for the search they said they were going to conduct (but did something else instead).
Honestly the solution to this violates forum rules, but it's an effective and permanent way to stop evil people from doing evil things.