Your argument that Chechens aren't a monolith but Ukraine deserves to burn is logically inconsistent.
The fact of the matter is that monoliths don't exist, but it's largely immaterial as we are talking about the majority opinion in regions. Yes you can always find outliers, but the majority of Chechens have no love for Russia.
You should ask yourself why they would suddenly align with this action.
Your argument that Chechens aren't a monolith but Ukraine deserves to burn is logically inconsistent.
I never said that "Ukraine deserves to burn". For one, it doesn't exist. But assuming you mean Little Russia, it should be taken by Russia, but obviously not destroyed. That defeats the purpose of taking it.
Yes you can always find outliers, but the majority of Chechens have no love for Russia.
I don't know, nearly all of their budget comes from Kremlin subsidies.
You should ask yourself why they would suddenly align with this action.
Because Kadyrov wants to show loyalty to the tsar.
You two certainly have that in common - wanting to show your loyalty.
But a better question in his case is why? You clearly don't understand the economic cash flow in Russia so I will explain - Moscow and it's regions produce very little especially in terms of food. The more southern regions is where most of that occurs.
The intent of their move is to position themselves for ultimately splitting the country. It is sadly inevitable at this point as your "Tsar" has no heirs and has killed anyone capable.
For what it's worth I'm glad you have some love for Russia, but the long term prospects of the country are incredibly grim and made worse by this adventurism. There is no way to recoup the costs and it likely is going to end with the country eventually splitting into different warlords.
I agree, but what's your point?
Surely, you weren't actually arguing that Chechens were a monolith. The mere existence of Kadyrov shows that to be false.
Your argument that Chechens aren't a monolith but Ukraine deserves to burn is logically inconsistent.
The fact of the matter is that monoliths don't exist, but it's largely immaterial as we are talking about the majority opinion in regions. Yes you can always find outliers, but the majority of Chechens have no love for Russia.
You should ask yourself why they would suddenly align with this action.
I never said that "Ukraine deserves to burn". For one, it doesn't exist. But assuming you mean Little Russia, it should be taken by Russia, but obviously not destroyed. That defeats the purpose of taking it.
I don't know, nearly all of their budget comes from Kremlin subsidies.
Because Kadyrov wants to show loyalty to the tsar.
You two certainly have that in common - wanting to show your loyalty.
But a better question in his case is why? You clearly don't understand the economic cash flow in Russia so I will explain - Moscow and it's regions produce very little especially in terms of food. The more southern regions is where most of that occurs.
The intent of their move is to position themselves for ultimately splitting the country. It is sadly inevitable at this point as your "Tsar" has no heirs and has killed anyone capable.
For what it's worth I'm glad you have some love for Russia, but the long term prospects of the country are incredibly grim and made worse by this adventurism. There is no way to recoup the costs and it likely is going to end with the country eventually splitting into different warlords.