It isn't wrong. I mean, the representation in this picture is laughable, but otherwise the point is made. Adult males who obsess over animated underage girls need to shut the fuck up. "But ackshually she's a thou-" No. Rightoids and mutants alike can go directly into the sun.
Its funny how the "thousand year old" argument is used so often to mock the loli-lovers, when its mostly a literal joke to even them (which only became mainstream because of Fire Emblem Awakening selling too many copies and getting the mainstream Lefties into a niche series), and otherwise their arguments mostly consist of "its a fucking drawing bro."
Probably easier to blowup a meme argument that is (as well as anyone who actually uses it) retarded than actually engage with an actual difficult minefield like that one though.
There’s an actual argument in that anime is used to help groom a lot of the time plus two things:
The first is “if the MSM can program the left, why can’t fictional media at least have an influence”?
The second is the entire reason people are outraged over Cuties and drag queens and all that shit is because of the influence it has on kids, so why wouldn’t this stuff have at least a partial one. I know both sound super similar, but the first is more generalized and also covers “video games causing violence”, which I don’t believe is wholly true, only that video games may help push people who were already thinking about it over the edge, while the second is specific to this and actually covers “why and how would people act on this shit”.
First, anime is a medium. Children's books and story hour can be and are being used to groom children too. You can be opposed to inappropriate media that directly targets children as their audience without trying to be against that media when it only targets a niche audience of adults. Basically, don't let your children watch anime that is intended for adults.
Your second assertion is false. People cared about Cuties because actual children were involved in the production of the film. People didn't care about drag shows until they started showing up in schools and parents started bringing their children to the shows.
Those actually are really good responses to both, and I do absolutely get the difference between the two, but I don’t think the general public is going to care when the pendulum swings back because all they’re gonna think is “all the people who’re trying to make my kid transition watch these weird Japanese cartoons and those cartoons have child-looking characters doing sexual shit and I don’t want it to exist”, as seen with the Satanic panic of the late 90s and early 00s due to Pokemon, MTG, DND, Yugioh, etc.
Hopefully that doesn’t happen but I don’t have faith in that.
Im opposed to loli porn because indulging deviant sexual arousal is for a fact more likely to make someone offend and not as people like to claim divert pedophiles from molesting kids
It isn't wrong. I mean, the representation in this picture is laughable, but otherwise the point is made. Adult males who obsess over animated underage girls need to shut the fuck up. "But ackshually she's a thou-" No. Rightoids and mutants alike can go directly into the sun.
Its funny how the "thousand year old" argument is used so often to mock the loli-lovers, when its mostly a literal joke to even them (which only became mainstream because of Fire Emblem Awakening selling too many copies and getting the mainstream Lefties into a niche series), and otherwise their arguments mostly consist of "its a fucking drawing bro."
Probably easier to blowup a meme argument that is (as well as anyone who actually uses it) retarded than actually engage with an actual difficult minefield like that one though.
There’s an actual argument in that anime is used to help groom a lot of the time plus two things:
The first is “if the MSM can program the left, why can’t fictional media at least have an influence”?
The second is the entire reason people are outraged over Cuties and drag queens and all that shit is because of the influence it has on kids, so why wouldn’t this stuff have at least a partial one. I know both sound super similar, but the first is more generalized and also covers “video games causing violence”, which I don’t believe is wholly true, only that video games may help push people who were already thinking about it over the edge, while the second is specific to this and actually covers “why and how would people act on this shit”.
First, anime is a medium. Children's books and story hour can be and are being used to groom children too. You can be opposed to inappropriate media that directly targets children as their audience without trying to be against that media when it only targets a niche audience of adults. Basically, don't let your children watch anime that is intended for adults.
Your second assertion is false. People cared about Cuties because actual children were involved in the production of the film. People didn't care about drag shows until they started showing up in schools and parents started bringing their children to the shows.
Those actually are really good responses to both, and I do absolutely get the difference between the two, but I don’t think the general public is going to care when the pendulum swings back because all they’re gonna think is “all the people who’re trying to make my kid transition watch these weird Japanese cartoons and those cartoons have child-looking characters doing sexual shit and I don’t want it to exist”, as seen with the Satanic panic of the late 90s and early 00s due to Pokemon, MTG, DND, Yugioh, etc.
Hopefully that doesn’t happen but I don’t have faith in that.
Im opposed to loli porn because indulging deviant sexual arousal is for a fact more likely to make someone offend and not as people like to claim divert pedophiles from molesting kids