Lmao that you think that this would at all remove feminism’s power. The technology would be limited, and also would be tightly controlled. Controlled by the very governments and institutions controlled by feminism. Do you not realize this cuts both ways? By your own philosophy, wouldn’t feminists welcome the chance to cut themselves off from men entirely, to form enclaves where they breed only hordes of more women, forming close knit and impenetrable ideological sets?
If everything that you think is true (worth noting that it isn’t- COVID and the vaccines were not genetically engineered by a cabal of women to wipe out men, as just one example), this would herald the actual ability to implement Solanas’s ideas. Technology is not a solution to an ideological problem. You have to address the actual ideological roots, which you are not capable of doing since you are essentially the male Solanas.
“If we give the people I think want to kill us a method to make us obsolete, then our victory is assured!”
I won’t even go into all the other myriad issues with your philosophy. The fact that by your own standards you are happy to hand victory over to those you say are vile enemies is enough to show your utter incoherency.
I don’t have a “plan” to address what you see as the problem because I think the problem is different. I don’t think the issue is that women are conspiring against men and if we could just return to a strong patriarchal society we would have no issues.
As a stop gap, what needs to be done is to build up strong places and strong bonds of trust. Make families, make friends, build communities, and build each other up in truth, virtue, and God to be able to ride out the coming storm. What comes next? Who can say. But we won’t find salvation in technological ascendency- it has never demonstrably fixed any of the core issues in mankind. That path has already been walked a number of times.
Lmao that you think that this would at all remove feminism’s power. The technology would be limited, and also would be tightly controlled. Controlled by the very governments and institutions controlled by feminism. Do you not realize this cuts both ways? By your own philosophy, wouldn’t feminists welcome the chance to cut themselves off from men entirely, to form enclaves where they breed only hordes of more women, forming close knit and impenetrable ideological sets?
If everything that you think is true (worth noting that it isn’t- COVID and the vaccines were not genetically engineered by a cabal of women to wipe out men, as just one example), this would herald the actual ability to implement Solanas’s ideas. Technology is not a solution to an ideological problem. You have to address the actual ideological roots, which you are not capable of doing since you are essentially the male Solanas.
“If we give the people I think want to kill us a method to make us obsolete, then our victory is assured!”
I won’t even go into all the other myriad issues with your philosophy. The fact that by your own standards you are happy to hand victory over to those you say are vile enemies is enough to show your utter incoherency.
I don’t have a “plan” to address what you see as the problem because I think the problem is different. I don’t think the issue is that women are conspiring against men and if we could just return to a strong patriarchal society we would have no issues.
As a stop gap, what needs to be done is to build up strong places and strong bonds of trust. Make families, make friends, build communities, and build each other up in truth, virtue, and God to be able to ride out the coming storm. What comes next? Who can say. But we won’t find salvation in technological ascendency- it has never demonstrably fixed any of the core issues in mankind. That path has already been walked a number of times.