do you GET it yet? [META]
(i.imgflip.com)
![do you GET it yet? [META]](https://i.imgflip.com/7bze4d.jpg){kind=link}
Comments (35)
sorted by:
Don Lemon getting unceremoniously thrown out kind of proves I'm right.
Women's #1 race grifter, but he said something they didn't like, and his career is over.
I will delete this if it gets 5 downvotes, but you have to comment why you think it’s not funny first
Ligma balls.
This but unironically
What is supposed to be funny about it exactly?
Shouldn’t have to explain it but I suppose for the slower kids in the back:
He asserts that women, all of them, across time and space, are part of an unspoken conspiracy. The only way that would be possible would be with telepathy. The only way telepathy is possible is with complete mastery over their energy body and the awakening of all 7 major chakra (as seen in OP)
I'm not saying he's right but it could be a biological cause, though I don't think even he has said "all women across time and space". He has said his own mother was a good one.
I get the joke now though, except for the pigmen part. :)
Telepathy is biology
I’m convinced he’s playing the triple con:
Surface level - incel who hates women
Con level 1 - woman trying to make incels seem like nazis
Con level 2 - nazi playing a game where he switches every occurrence of “jew” in his rants with “white woman”
Con level 3 - chatGPT program with the prompt “hypernormalization of retardation”
I put that into Bing and it spit out a link to ConPro.
I wouldn't bother talking to him, he's just mad that he can't constantly deflect to Jews every time someone goes against his precious white women.
They might as well wear fucking collars. They are incapable of criticizing women because their ideology demands they see women as their allies.
You have the self-reflection capabilities of a newborn dog. This is why so many people think you’re a Level 2 Con. But I see through you
Your alternate personalities don't count.
The difference being that I openly admit that the victory condition for my ideology is male solidarity against women. You still haven't admitted that yours relies on people having a positive view of women.
No, I don't. I assert that a certain unknown number of them are part of a large conspiracy, which the normies support because it's in the in-group's interest to do so.
Actually, to put my position extremely bluntly and explain it perfectly - The SCUM Manifesto was not satire. It was a roadmap to feminist rule with red herrings of insanity sprinkled in to make people believe it's just a joke.
You, of all fucking people, should know what in-group bias is.
When did their dastardly, vile plans first get set into motion?
There are several dates you could point to, but I'd say that the real cohesive dehumanization narrative we have now began post SCUM Manifesto, in academia, mainly through women's studies - these people could identify each other easily through having that degree in their resume and continue hiring until they have some sort of influence through sheer numbers.
The reason it seems so severe now is because they've been building up their positions for around 50 years straight.
And if you really don't believe that is the case, then explain why the NYT praised her manifesto.
> everything was on track until 1967
Lmao, good one imp
If you're not going to engage constructively, why am I even bothering to explain my position?
Also, it was published in 1968. The original draft was in 1967 but she couldn't find a publisher that year.
I think a good primer on the influence of Solanas on feminist goals is this normie MRA piece about her.
Shill confirmed
Low effort nonsense?
It’s a meta post but is it any more low effort than linking to some boundingintocomics ragebait article or whatever the hell you call imps posts?
Last time I made a high-effort post, your people botted it down.
World governments bowing to the demands of the Kering Foundation was worth talking about, but you'd rather we all whine impotently about the Jews until one of your acolytes shoots up a synagogue. You talk all about foreign influence, but when it's French pedophiles acting on women's behalf, suddenly it's not interesting. If Kering was Israeli, you'd bot my posts up, rather than down.
Talking about how anti-immigration movements are completely ignoring the onslaught of Ukrainian female "refugees" is important, but no, here's another "lol niggers" post from a ConPro tard.
Of your last 25 posts (first page) I only downvoted one and upvoted 3 of them.
The one I downvoted was this one:
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/16aAN81o5Q/feminists-are-taking-sturgeons-p/c
Because it’s just as retarded and nonsensical as the idiots who post “I just stubbed my toe! Fucking ZOG!”
Just stop straw manning every criticism of yourself and your approach and I think you’d be a lot more effective, in whatever the hell your goal is.
Lmfao, mUh “breeding age female invaders”
The only “refugees” people oppose are violence prone adult male economic migrants
"If I can fuck them, it's okay for them to steal jobs. Only the evil Mexican economic migrants who I can't fuck are evil."
I think you forget the main argument against immigration is a lack of jobs, not fabricated violence stories because people still don't understand how corrupt European rape laws actually are.
You're not exactly disproving my theory about your side, that your success is intrinsically tied to people's view of women as good people and worth starting a family with.
You said you'd delete at -5, you're now at double that.
I said I would delete after 5 people explained how this post isn’t funny. So far I see one person who didn’t get the joke, one person who called it low effort (debatable), one person who said “ligma balls”, and you, but you haven’t met the criterion either
You're already at -9.