It's not hard to vet your new friends, Dr Peterson. If I can do it, I'm sure you can.
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
In fairness, almost every other comparison isn't as extreme as 98%. That's pretty onesided. It's so onesided that "teach men not to rape" never could be an answer. There will always be someone. Hell, the only real solution to stop the few random men from grabbing a woman's ass is to literally have another man kick the shit out of them at literally any time because it's that predictable, that biologically ingrained, and that unavoidable.
Also in fairness, that number is completely unsourced, and there's a 98% chance it's bullshit.
I tried to find it, the closet I could do was some liberal college sheet addressing "misinformation" and going on about trans people and how victims have no responsibility to try to not prevent rape. It was poorly worded, poorly reasoned, and poorly sourced as well.
There's just no way that number makes any sense, unless they're using some very misleading definition of 'sexual assault,' and maybe the other 2% of assaulters are transwomen or something.
I think I've previously seen that it's somewhere over 80% of all acts of sexual assault are done by men, and I've never really seen any evidence that would suggest it's even close to a 50-50 split.
Physical violence is predominantly a male thing (specifically under 40), sexual violence even more so.
I didn't say it was 50-50, I said it wasn't 98-2.
Can we agree over 80%?