I was actually wondering where the pointless back-and-forth between Imp and Antonio was in this thread. I’m fairly new here, but I thought from experience that there had to be such a back-and-forth in every thread.
Fair enough, intractable arguments are frustrating both ways and being frustrated rarely makes anyone more reasonable, so that much is an understandable defence.
I'm sure, if that is true, it was entirely because they were stalking you for disagreeing on another sub. It absolutely cannot be because people, who may crosspost, just don't like you.
To be fair to the wordless downvoters, have you ever tried arguing with imp? It's not very productive
True.
But it IS fun!
I was actually wondering where the pointless back-and-forth between Imp and Antonio was in this thread. I’m fairly new here, but I thought from experience that there had to be such a back-and-forth in every thread.
In my defense, most of the people I argue with are obviously in bad faith.
It's difficult to be constructive with people who shill and lie.
Fair enough, intractable arguments are frustrating both ways and being frustrated rarely makes anyone more reasonable, so that much is an understandable defence.
You are slipping further and further into the feminist mindset.
It went from paranoia over invisible ConPro stalkers to "they are all bad faith, that's why I'm always right."
Invisible ConPro stalkers?
They've made three threads about me in the last week.
I'm sure, if that is true, it was entirely because they were stalking you for disagreeing on another sub. It absolutely cannot be because people, who may crosspost, just don't like you.