This study, brought to you by the same people who think cow farts are responsible for Palau disappearing under the waves and not natural erosion due to storms and reef/habitat destruction. Ocean water's been rising for longer than humans have had villages, the recent flooding of those islands ain't new, and it ain't from white man burning gas stoves.
Realistically, our use of fossil fuels is certainly having impact on the climate. I think that's beyond any shadow of doubt. To what degree, nobody knows.
What I am absolutely certain of is that we are not going to fix it by eliminating cattle farms.
If we want to do something about it we need more nuclear reactors. Whether that's fission or fusion, nuclear is the only solution.
The Earth is coming out of an ice age. No matter what we do it's going to continue to get warmer for a few thousand years. We cannot affect the climate to any significant degree, it's hubris to think so. The globalist 'we'll throw reflective flakes in the air to reflect sunlight' (or any other power/money grabbing idea) would result in catastrophic loss of money, and messing up things we don't understand.
All of the climate alarmism is about money and power. A tertiary factor is they want us to not focus on pollution. We can control pollution, but it wouldn't fall on the little guy's shoulders, it would be big business at fault. So, that's not the narrative of the day. Look the other way, make yourselves miserable, it's the average person's fault. Not us.
We should move to stage 4 nuclear, simply because it's better, but not because of 'the climate'. A lot of oil refining is done by huge pits and bacteria now, overall less pollution, but thorium salt reactors would be more powerful and better than other options.
This study, brought to you by the same people who think cow farts are responsible for Palau disappearing under the waves and not natural erosion due to storms and reef/habitat destruction. Ocean water's been rising for longer than humans have had villages, the recent flooding of those islands ain't new, and it ain't from white man burning gas stoves.
Realistically, our use of fossil fuels is certainly having impact on the climate. I think that's beyond any shadow of doubt. To what degree, nobody knows.
What I am absolutely certain of is that we are not going to fix it by eliminating cattle farms.
If we want to do something about it we need more nuclear reactors. Whether that's fission or fusion, nuclear is the only solution.
The Earth is coming out of an ice age. No matter what we do it's going to continue to get warmer for a few thousand years. We cannot affect the climate to any significant degree, it's hubris to think so. The globalist 'we'll throw reflective flakes in the air to reflect sunlight' (or any other power/money grabbing idea) would result in catastrophic loss of money, and messing up things we don't understand.
All of the climate alarmism is about money and power. A tertiary factor is they want us to not focus on pollution. We can control pollution, but it wouldn't fall on the little guy's shoulders, it would be big business at fault. So, that's not the narrative of the day. Look the other way, make yourselves miserable, it's the average person's fault. Not us.
We should move to stage 4 nuclear, simply because it's better, but not because of 'the climate'. A lot of oil refining is done by huge pits and bacteria now, overall less pollution, but thorium salt reactors would be more powerful and better than other options.
i don't, because they can't quantify it.