Propagandists criticize whether deserved or not, and they use falsehoods to do so. I see no value in listening to them. All credible sources must be capable of saying "even though I don't like Biden, there is no credible evidence he did this in particular".
My question is: why do we have to rely on people on the left, like Greenwald, Mate and Tracey, and Hersh, to write good journalism criticizing the regime?
Greenwald does good journalism. Hersh does not, you just like him because he tells you what you want to hear. I don't even know the other two.
So he was consistent, like GG, and wasn't a Democratic Party hack. Good to know.
He's just one of those commies who is so far left that he sees the Democrats and Republicans as almost the same. He sees America as fundamentally evil. That said, he also knows what will win him awards so he targets the Republicans far more.
Oh wow, BELLINGCAT!
Should have known he'd be on the FSB hate list. They're seen as highly credible in the OSINT community.
"Russia blew up its own pipeline", for which you have zero evidence
I have plenty of circumstantial evidence and logical deduction. You have zero evidence of the US doing it.
you have Russia Derangement Syndrome (evidenced by the fact that you call me an FSB employee).
Not at all. I agreed with Russia/Putin in a lot of areas and defend Russia on a lot of topics, just not things like empire building through wars of aggression.
The only thing that saved Europe was the unusually warm winter. Or people would have frozen and starved
Not true at all. Germany was at 0 risk from the winter even under "worst case" scenarios.
Biden has never seen a war he doesn't love.
You mean like Afghanistan?
now he is escalating massively in Ukraine.
Not at all. Biden just goes along with whatever the euros want to do. Lately, this has meant allowing a small number of tanks to be sent sometime later this year. It's not an escalation.
Russian roads are so bad that people would not be able to see the difference between a before and after a HIMARS strike picture.
Russians slowly adapted to HIMARS by moving their ammo stockpiles outside of HIMARS range and taking pains to disperse them. Sometimes they fuck up and get hit, but its far more rare now.
ATACMS is so important because it would nullify the main Russian adaptive measure of simply moving their ammo stockpiles further back. ATACMS would bring back the days of a big Russian ammo stockpile blowing up almost every night. Moving them further away would be impossible because the ATACMS range is so long at ~300km that it simply wouldn't be possible to keep stockpiles anywhere in theater. This would create a problem the Russians might never solve, and if they did, it would still cause a lot of inefficiency and massively degrade logistics.
CIA spook: HAHA, RUSSIANS! TAKE THAT! Your roads are now full of potholes. HIMARS O'CLOCK!
I don't know why you keep on with the "pothole" meme when there was widely reported incidents where HIMARS kills hundreds of Russian soldiers in a single strike: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makiivka_military_quarters_shelling HIMARS are very inefficient at blowing up a strongly reinforced large bridge, but they still put that bridge out of action anyway.
The military-industrial complex calls the shots.
No, the Democrat donor class elite agents who staff the white house do. There is no such thing as the MI complex and the Democrats hate the military anyway. Biden only gives money to Ukraine as a virtue signal.
Propagandists criticize whether deserved or not, and they use falsehoods to do so. I see no value in listening to them. All credible sources must be capable of saying "even though I don't like Biden, there is no credible evidence he did this in particular".
Yeah sure. But you have no evidence that he is a propagandist.
He's just one of those commies who is so far left that he sees the Democrats and Republicans as almost the same.
So he's getting stuff right?
He sees America as fundamentally evil
As far as I know, Hersh talks mostly about foreign policy. American foreign policy is indisputably fundamentally evil. I could go further and say that American domestic policy is also fundamentally evil. What do you call neutering 13-year-old kids if not that?
You need to be able to distinguish between a country, the people - and the criminals who rule over it.
Should have known he'd be on the FSB hate list. They're seen as highly credible in the OSINT community.
Anything funded by the British and the Americans will be on the hitlist of anyone who cares about the truth. That is not the OSINT "community", who are autistic retards pushing American foreign policy.
I have plenty of circumstantial evidence and logical deduction. You have zero evidence of the US doing it.
No, you have squat. I have Biden's repeated threats to destroy it, the fact that it's in American interests, Victoria Nuland admitting that she is happy that it was blown up, Blinken saying that what Russia supposedly did "is a great opportunity", and Hersh's article.
Not at all. I agreed with Russia/Putin in a lot of areas and defend Russia on a lot of topics, just not things like empire building through wars of aggression.
[American empire looking through the curtans.]
Not true at all. Germany was at 0 risk from the winter even under "worst case" scenarios.
German industry was collapsing even before winter. And I know that you've rationalized all sorts of stuff, and now declare victory because you got extraordinarily, once-in-a-lifetime lucky, but no.
You mean like Afghanistan?
Which he voted for, which he supported. Apparently, Raytheon was not making enough money off of a lightweight US presence, so out they go.
Not at all. Biden just goes along with whatever the euros want to do. Lately, this has meant allowing a small number of tanks to be sent sometime later this year. It's not an escalation.
Bennett admitted that Scholz and Macron wanted peace, and Bozo Johnson didn't. Biden supported the Bozo. Stop blaming us for all this nonsense.
ATACMS is so important because it would nullify the main Russian adaptive measure of simply moving their ammo stockpiles further back. ATACMS would bring back the days of a big Russian ammo stockpile blowing up almost every night
So it's an act of war, like blowing up NS2, and Russia should retaliate, you say?
I don't know why you keep on with the "pothole" meme when there was widely reported incidents where HIMARS kills hundreds of Russian soldiers in a single strike: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makiivka_military_quarters_shelling HIMARS are very inefficient at blowing up a strongly reinforced large bridge, but they still put that bridge out of action anyway.
Is that the incident where Russian command was so retarded that they put everyone together? I wouldn't be bragging about killing hundreds of Rusdsian soldiers btw. I'm sure you were outraged about that whole 'Russian bounties' hoax, given Murica's actions, next time I think it will not be a hoax.
No, the Democrat donor class elite agents who staff the white house do. There is no such thing as the MI complex and the Democrats hate the military anyway. Biden only gives money to Ukraine as a virtue signal.
LOL! Biden and the Dems increaased the military budget to previously unknown heights. And Austin was literally plucked from the board of Raytheon. They love MIC bribes as much as Republicans do.
But you have no evidence that he is a propagandist.
Of course I do. He has a history is saying wrong shit without evidence always aimed at a singular agenda of attacking America. I would say the same thing if someone was deranged in their criticism of Putin and kept calling Putin a homosexual or something.
American foreign policy is indisputably fundamentally evil.
Nope. American foreign policy is the best thing that ever happened to the world. We saved humanity from both fascism and communism, and that was just in 50 years.
You need to be able to distinguish between a country, the people - and the criminals who rule over it.
Well as much as I don't like Biden, I wouldn't go so far as to call him a crim- BREAKING NEWS, MORE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS FOUND, THIS TIME UNDER BIDEN'S BED IN BIDEN'S STASH OF VINTAGE PORNO MAGAZINES ALONG WITH A RECEIPT FROM XI JINGPING "FOR THE BIG GUY" - uhhh, well then.
Which he voted for, which he supported.
Biden voted with his party, and the Democrats were opposed to Afghanistan as soon as it became politically safe to do so. They always wanted to run away, they were just afraid of being called cowards. Trump unfortunately gave them cover to leave by making it bipartisan and insulating them from being called cowards. Trump was a massive idiot sometimes, and his Afghanistan policy was one of the biggest examples.
Apparently, Raytheon was not making enough money off of a lightweight US presence, so out they go.
That's an idiotic and intellectually dishonest argument that lays bare how nonsensical your "Raytheon controls the US government" line is. If that was true, Raytheon would have successfully escalated the war instead of allowing the de-escalation and reduction of US footprint there. Raytheon also would have opposed the pull out. Some money is better than no money. Try to be logically consistent at least.
Bennett admitted that Scholz and Macron wanted peace, and Bozo Johnson didn't. Biden supported the Bozo.
Germany and France were cowards who didn't want to help Ukraine and got pressured into it so they wouldn't look bad to the public. Boris Johnson was a strong leader who stood up for freedom and democracy against a neo-Soviet war of conquest.
And as for Bennett: "A former Israeli prime minister is walking back his suggestion that the United States may have "blocked" an agreement last year to end the war in Ukraine, a claim that had been amplified by Russian state media and Kremlin sympathizers in the West... He relayed to Putin a request from Zelenskyy to meet. "They're Nazis, they're warmongers, I won't meet him," Putin responded, in Bennett's telling... "It's unsure there was any deal to be made," Bennett said in response to Musk. "At the time I gave it roughly a 50% chance. Americans felt chances were way lower. Hard to tell who was right." ... The English subtitles are flawed, however. In the exchange, Bennett and the interviewer do not use the word "blocked" but rather "stopped," referring to ongoing peace talks, not an agreement. In the interview, Bennett himself notes that it was not the US, France, or Germany that put an end to any peace talks. Rather, "The Bucha massacre, once that happened, I said: 'It's over,'" Bennett recalled."
So it's an act of war, like blowing up NS2, and Russia should retaliate, you say?
Sure, it's an act of war. Let's go to war, NATO vs Russia. Sound good to you? You bring your empty nuke threats, and we will utterly destroy all your deployed forces in maybe 2 weeks while also sinking your whole navy around the world.
I'm sure you were outraged about that whole 'Russian bounties' hoax, given Murica's actions, next time I think it will not be a hoax.
No I wasn't outraged at all. That was a Democrat play acting outrage thing. That's fine if Russia wants to fuck with the United States, we'll fuck them back twice as hard. The only thing that outrages me is when the weak bitch Democrats allow the United States to be attacked without launching the appropriate retaliation to teach the attackers a swift lesson about who the most powerful nation in the world truly is. Americans don't work hard and produce the most economic wealth in the world just to have our elected leaders cuck us out.
Biden and the Dems increaased the military budget to previously unknown heights.
Democrats constantly try to limit the growth of, or otherwise reduce, the military's budget. Democrats also try to undermine the military by forcing up VA and personnel benefits spending, which makes our soldiers too expensive and forces us to compensate by reducing the size of the military. You just seem to be ignorant of budget politics. Democrats demanded 1:1 cuts in defense for cuts in EVERYTHING ELSE even though Defense is only 12% of the budget.
Propagandists criticize whether deserved or not, and they use falsehoods to do so. I see no value in listening to them. All credible sources must be capable of saying "even though I don't like Biden, there is no credible evidence he did this in particular".
Greenwald does good journalism. Hersh does not, you just like him because he tells you what you want to hear. I don't even know the other two.
He's just one of those commies who is so far left that he sees the Democrats and Republicans as almost the same. He sees America as fundamentally evil. That said, he also knows what will win him awards so he targets the Republicans far more.
Should have known he'd be on the FSB hate list. They're seen as highly credible in the OSINT community.
I have plenty of circumstantial evidence and logical deduction. You have zero evidence of the US doing it.
Not at all. I agreed with Russia/Putin in a lot of areas and defend Russia on a lot of topics, just not things like empire building through wars of aggression.
Not true at all. Germany was at 0 risk from the winter even under "worst case" scenarios.
You mean like Afghanistan?
Not at all. Biden just goes along with whatever the euros want to do. Lately, this has meant allowing a small number of tanks to be sent sometime later this year. It's not an escalation.
Russians slowly adapted to HIMARS by moving their ammo stockpiles outside of HIMARS range and taking pains to disperse them. Sometimes they fuck up and get hit, but its far more rare now.
ATACMS is so important because it would nullify the main Russian adaptive measure of simply moving their ammo stockpiles further back. ATACMS would bring back the days of a big Russian ammo stockpile blowing up almost every night. Moving them further away would be impossible because the ATACMS range is so long at ~300km that it simply wouldn't be possible to keep stockpiles anywhere in theater. This would create a problem the Russians might never solve, and if they did, it would still cause a lot of inefficiency and massively degrade logistics.
I don't know why you keep on with the "pothole" meme when there was widely reported incidents where HIMARS kills hundreds of Russian soldiers in a single strike: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makiivka_military_quarters_shelling HIMARS are very inefficient at blowing up a strongly reinforced large bridge, but they still put that bridge out of action anyway.
No, the Democrat donor class elite agents who staff the white house do. There is no such thing as the MI complex and the Democrats hate the military anyway. Biden only gives money to Ukraine as a virtue signal.
Yeah sure. But you have no evidence that he is a propagandist.
So he's getting stuff right?
As far as I know, Hersh talks mostly about foreign policy. American foreign policy is indisputably fundamentally evil. I could go further and say that American domestic policy is also fundamentally evil. What do you call neutering 13-year-old kids if not that?
You need to be able to distinguish between a country, the people - and the criminals who rule over it.
Anything funded by the British and the Americans will be on the hitlist of anyone who cares about the truth. That is not the OSINT "community", who are autistic retards pushing American foreign policy.
No, you have squat. I have Biden's repeated threats to destroy it, the fact that it's in American interests, Victoria Nuland admitting that she is happy that it was blown up, Blinken saying that what Russia supposedly did "is a great opportunity", and Hersh's article.
[American empire looking through the curtans.]
German industry was collapsing even before winter. And I know that you've rationalized all sorts of stuff, and now declare victory because you got extraordinarily, once-in-a-lifetime lucky, but no.
Which he voted for, which he supported. Apparently, Raytheon was not making enough money off of a lightweight US presence, so out they go.
Bennett admitted that Scholz and Macron wanted peace, and Bozo Johnson didn't. Biden supported the Bozo. Stop blaming us for all this nonsense.
So it's an act of war, like blowing up NS2, and Russia should retaliate, you say?
Is that the incident where Russian command was so retarded that they put everyone together? I wouldn't be bragging about killing hundreds of Rusdsian soldiers btw. I'm sure you were outraged about that whole 'Russian bounties' hoax, given Murica's actions, next time I think it will not be a hoax.
LOL! Biden and the Dems increaased the military budget to previously unknown heights. And Austin was literally plucked from the board of Raytheon. They love MIC bribes as much as Republicans do.
Of course I do. He has a history is saying wrong shit without evidence always aimed at a singular agenda of attacking America. I would say the same thing if someone was deranged in their criticism of Putin and kept calling Putin a homosexual or something.
Nope. American foreign policy is the best thing that ever happened to the world. We saved humanity from both fascism and communism, and that was just in 50 years.
Well as much as I don't like Biden, I wouldn't go so far as to call him a crim- BREAKING NEWS, MORE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS FOUND, THIS TIME UNDER BIDEN'S BED IN BIDEN'S STASH OF VINTAGE PORNO MAGAZINES ALONG WITH A RECEIPT FROM XI JINGPING "FOR THE BIG GUY" - uhhh, well then.
Biden voted with his party, and the Democrats were opposed to Afghanistan as soon as it became politically safe to do so. They always wanted to run away, they were just afraid of being called cowards. Trump unfortunately gave them cover to leave by making it bipartisan and insulating them from being called cowards. Trump was a massive idiot sometimes, and his Afghanistan policy was one of the biggest examples.
That's an idiotic and intellectually dishonest argument that lays bare how nonsensical your "Raytheon controls the US government" line is. If that was true, Raytheon would have successfully escalated the war instead of allowing the de-escalation and reduction of US footprint there. Raytheon also would have opposed the pull out. Some money is better than no money. Try to be logically consistent at least.
Germany and France were cowards who didn't want to help Ukraine and got pressured into it so they wouldn't look bad to the public. Boris Johnson was a strong leader who stood up for freedom and democracy against a neo-Soviet war of conquest.
And as for Bennett: "A former Israeli prime minister is walking back his suggestion that the United States may have "blocked" an agreement last year to end the war in Ukraine, a claim that had been amplified by Russian state media and Kremlin sympathizers in the West... He relayed to Putin a request from Zelenskyy to meet. "They're Nazis, they're warmongers, I won't meet him," Putin responded, in Bennett's telling... "It's unsure there was any deal to be made," Bennett said in response to Musk. "At the time I gave it roughly a 50% chance. Americans felt chances were way lower. Hard to tell who was right." ... The English subtitles are flawed, however. In the exchange, Bennett and the interviewer do not use the word "blocked" but rather "stopped," referring to ongoing peace talks, not an agreement. In the interview, Bennett himself notes that it was not the US, France, or Germany that put an end to any peace talks. Rather, "The Bucha massacre, once that happened, I said: 'It's over,'" Bennett recalled."
Sure, it's an act of war. Let's go to war, NATO vs Russia. Sound good to you? You bring your empty nuke threats, and we will utterly destroy all your deployed forces in maybe 2 weeks while also sinking your whole navy around the world.
No I wasn't outraged at all. That was a Democrat play acting outrage thing. That's fine if Russia wants to fuck with the United States, we'll fuck them back twice as hard. The only thing that outrages me is when the weak bitch Democrats allow the United States to be attacked without launching the appropriate retaliation to teach the attackers a swift lesson about who the most powerful nation in the world truly is. Americans don't work hard and produce the most economic wealth in the world just to have our elected leaders cuck us out.
Democrats constantly try to limit the growth of, or otherwise reduce, the military's budget. Democrats also try to undermine the military by forcing up VA and personnel benefits spending, which makes our soldiers too expensive and forces us to compensate by reducing the size of the military. You just seem to be ignorant of budget politics. Democrats demanded 1:1 cuts in defense for cuts in EVERYTHING ELSE even though Defense is only 12% of the budget.