Always picking the lesser of the evils is a loser's game. Because you're giving it license to go as evil as it can, as long as it's slightly less evil than the other ones.
Now instead of search results, you'll get a summary page where ChatGPT has written a StackExchange/Quora style answer to your question, with a TL;DR then a longer explanation, then finally the links it used to formulate that answer which based on my understanding from Antonio may not even be actual sources for what it's claiming.
Instead of SJWs linking clickbait headlines to own you in a debate, they'll link you to ChatGPT FactCheck pages that say "Donald Trump instigated the January 6th Terror Attack on the US Capitol. Here's a timeline of events leading to the tragedy..." followed by a summary of regurgitated fake news with little [citations] all over the place that nobody will look at. These answers will be good enough for most people. What, you don't trust Artificial Intelligence? There's no politics here, it's a completely unbiased computer algorithm. You don't believe in Computer Science?
If you're not using brave search(not talking about the browser, I use Firefox) you're doing it wrong imho. It's quite the good search engine with a lot of stuff Google has(like instant answers, stuff like calculator, that sort of thing). Can only recommend.
I'll reserve judgement until I get to try it, hopefully it won't be absolutely sanitized like the original.
Bing is still my favorite search engine.
So you're giving Microsoft a pass despite all of their pushing of Women's Day propaganda?
Who's your handler? Melinda Gates?
other options are
Google - I don't need to say anything.
Apple - "We need to hire less men in tech" - Tim Cook.
Mozilla - Actively involved in pushing for misogyny laws.
Always picking the lesser of the evils is a loser's game. Because you're giving it license to go as evil as it can, as long as it's slightly less evil than the other ones.
Those aren't all other available options. But I guess Bing wouldn't show you alternative competitors..
It's going to reach levels of poz previously thought impossible.
And I bet the Googles at Google are working on something similar. Internet search will be dead soon.
Now instead of search results, you'll get a summary page where ChatGPT has written a StackExchange/Quora style answer to your question, with a TL;DR then a longer explanation, then finally the links it used to formulate that answer which based on my understanding from Antonio may not even be actual sources for what it's claiming.
Instead of SJWs linking clickbait headlines to own you in a debate, they'll link you to ChatGPT FactCheck pages that say "Donald Trump instigated the January 6th Terror Attack on the US Capitol. Here's a timeline of events leading to the tragedy..." followed by a summary of regurgitated fake news with little [citations] all over the place that nobody will look at. These answers will be good enough for most people. What, you don't trust Artificial Intelligence? There's no politics here, it's a completely unbiased computer algorithm. You don't believe in Computer Science?
I have faith in Microsoft.
Google will probably have theirs say "Valerie Solanas is right about men" before they publish it.
I know you do. You're a raging fucking retard, but at least you're consistent in that I guess.
Microsoft has never failed me before, I find all the sources I need through Bing.
The only time I was angry at them is when it suggested violence against women rates when I asked for violence by women.
If anything, it will be MORE sanitized.
If you're not using brave search(not talking about the browser, I use Firefox) you're doing it wrong imho. It's quite the good search engine with a lot of stuff Google has(like instant answers, stuff like calculator, that sort of thing). Can only recommend.