No, it does. It's actually worse than what I claimed, because they don't punish the user, they punish the company. Users could just go to platforms women wouldn't monitor, like here.
But by making it the company's problem...they basically make women's undeserved protection from criticism a necessary expense for all tech companies, no matter the size. This is the same kind of ridiculous thing you see in dictatorships, for instance in China, where all tech companies have to submit to the government for approval before they can operate with Chinese people's data. You might recall the heavy fines, and large fall in Tencent's stock price as a result, for not limiting the gaming time of Chinese children.
They have the nerve to talk about protecting people from Russia's anti-democracy ideas, while they plan to completely ban all speech against the ruling class.
As I said previously, the UK government is illegitimate. It's past time to file suit for persecution of the male sex.
The More Feminine Way is not a legitimate government.
they basically make women's undeserved protection from criticism
The law is about revenge porn. Not criticism. Dummy.
As I said previously, the UK government is illegitimate.
And as I said previously, you are a retard. You cited the Rome Statute which says nothing about governments being illegitimate. Although it is, because it protects grooming gangs!
It's past time to file suit for persecution of the male sex.
Yes, and the nice guards with black and pink swastika armbands are just taking you for a shower.
Speaking of swastika armbands, I'm surprised it wasn't Von Der Leyen who passed this. Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Geschlecht and all that.
"Revenge porn" (which isn't even a real crime, because if sex work is real work, why is telling your family your job such a problem?) is already illegal.
You cited the Rome Statute which says nothing about governments being illegitimate.
The Rome Statutes are the official guidelines of what constitutes a crime against humanity.
Yes, and the nice guards with black and pink swastika armbands are just taking you for a shower.
So your conspiracy theory is that the law is actually secretly about something other than what the law says?
"Revenge porn" (which isn't even a real crime, because if sex work is real work, why is telling your family your job such a problem?)
For one, because people have a right to not be exposed to explicit materials.
Secondly, telling OnlyFans thots' families that they are that, is not revenge porn. Revenge porn is recording your girlfriend, and then releasing nude or sexual images when she breaks up with you.
The Rome Statutes are the official guidelines of what constitutes a crime against humanity.
They're not 'official guidelines', they're just a treaty. And nowhere does it state that a government is illegitimate. You are nuts.
So you looked it up and realized that the plan as it is doesn't do what you claimed? Good to know.
No, it does. It's actually worse than what I claimed, because they don't punish the user, they punish the company. Users could just go to platforms women wouldn't monitor, like here.
But by making it the company's problem...they basically make women's undeserved protection from criticism a necessary expense for all tech companies, no matter the size. This is the same kind of ridiculous thing you see in dictatorships, for instance in China, where all tech companies have to submit to the government for approval before they can operate with Chinese people's data. You might recall the heavy fines, and large fall in Tencent's stock price as a result, for not limiting the gaming time of Chinese children.
They have the nerve to talk about protecting people from Russia's anti-democracy ideas, while they plan to completely ban all speech against the ruling class.
As I said previously, the UK government is illegitimate. It's past time to file suit for persecution of the male sex.
The More Feminine Way is not a legitimate government.
Women are not our superiors.
The law is about revenge porn. Not criticism. Dummy.
And as I said previously, you are a retard. You cited the Rome Statute which says nothing about governments being illegitimate. Although it is, because it protects grooming gangs!
Always the victim.
A spider is your superior.
Yes, and the nice guards with black and pink swastika armbands are just taking you for a shower.
Speaking of swastika armbands, I'm surprised it wasn't Von Der Leyen who passed this. Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Geschlecht and all that.
"Revenge porn" (which isn't even a real crime, because if sex work is real work, why is telling your family your job such a problem?) is already illegal.
The Rome Statutes are the official guidelines of what constitutes a crime against humanity.
So your conspiracy theory is that the law is actually secretly about something other than what the law says?
For one, because people have a right to not be exposed to explicit materials.
Secondly, telling OnlyFans thots' families that they are that, is not revenge porn. Revenge porn is recording your girlfriend, and then releasing nude or sexual images when she breaks up with you.
They're not 'official guidelines', they're just a treaty. And nowhere does it state that a government is illegitimate. You are nuts.