This is absolutely the result of a feminist orientation.
Letting gay or lesbian couples adopt children is a really bad idea, for the usual reasons. Lesbians, especially the ones driven by ideology, which is to say most lesbians, are massively confused about their relationships to children because they question the whole premise of womanhood and reject childbearing as something slavish and motherhood as "patriarchal."
Would they have done this had they adopted a girl? Would they even consider adopting a girl when it may be that their plan all along was to get hold of a helpless boy and torture him to death?
Evil is depressing. Totalitarian evil like feminism is horrifying, especially since there appears to be no stopping it.
All gender should be removed from custody fights and only thing that should be considered is who would raise the child better.
We'd probably see a huge increase in single dad's if we did that and lower child abuse if women couldn't pull the birth card for an advantage in courts.
I dunno man, Imp might be batshit but when all the info you have is "two feminist activist lesbians raped a boy in their care with dildos and beat him to death", starting with misandry as an initial presumed motive seems like a pretty fair assessment just on the balance of probability.
They're a pretty distinct group and being a feminist activist is a choice not an immutable characteristic so it is evidence of their character and mental state, hell within that subdemographic it's kind of ambiguous for many of them how much even being a lesbian isn't more of a conscientious objection than a sexual orientation. The onus at that point should probably be on proving that, contrary to the rest of their behaviour, that murder wasn't at least mostly motivated by man hating.
but when all the info you have is "two feminist activist lesbians raped a boy in their care with dildos and beat him to death", starting with misandry as an initial presumed motive seems like a pretty fair assessment just on the balance of probability.
See, you brought reason and probability into it. And I would agree with that. It's rather suspicious, although abuse occurs everywhere and it's not proof positive. My issue with the Imp is that he claims to know with certainty, not probability, what the cause of this is.
And that this 'shows' that feminism is about murdering boys, or whatever. That's obviously false, because not only has a connection not been demonstrated, there are many feminists who raise boys, and in fact, spoil them to such an extent that they become rotten to the core.
They're a pretty distinct group and being a feminist activist is a choice not an immutable characteristic so it is evidence of their character and mental state
Definitely. It sheds some light on their conduct, but it's by no means the end of the story. And I hate that it now sounds like I'm defending either these murderers or feminism in general.
The onus at that point should probably be on proving that, contrary to the rest of their behaviour, that murder wasn't at least mostly motivated by man hating.
And here again, I wouldn't even object to this statement. If you claimed to know with complete or near-complete certainty, on the other hand, I would take issue with that.
Wanna bet he will now furiously masturbate about Argentina's politics personally betraying him? After claiming that of Korea, Hungary, Lithuania, and basically half the countries of the world? Because he is personally connected to EVERY MALE EVER.
The TRAITOR PRESIDENT of Argentina is trying to make sure that his people don't go extinct, by bribing our Worse Halves into having children. Negotiating with TERRORISTS.
Men are denying themselves to women. WE ARE WINNING! Haha, womens! You're not getting this dick! Die mad about it, genocide pushers!
He BETRAYED me though. I do not forget. I do not forgive. When you throw in your lot with the women, Antonio will chase you to the gates of HELL! And we will prevail. How, I don't know, since men are only 49% of the population and many of them are TRAITORS, but I am sure of it! Maybe when the 90% death rate from the vaccine kicks in.
I don't know if he has a handler. Stop trying to make me sound ridiculous. He may just be bribed and blackmailed by women, like Ron DeSantis.
Argentina being feminist is not something I seriously have to justify. It's well known.
Hungary is not taking part in EU sanctions and still has high inflation, it has nothing to do with energy prices - it's a corrupt, incompetent leadership spending money they don't have.
But why do they rise higher in Hungary than nearly all of their European peers except for the even more incompetent feminist dystopia of Lithuania, and the failed state of Moldova?
Argentina.- The case of Lucio Dupuy, a young man beaten to death and sexually abused by two feminist activists, has put into debate that violence has no gender.
The women, one of them her mother, were members of the feminist movement in Argentina, defenders of abortion and members of the LGBT community.
The case of little Lucio is seen as an alert that not always because she is the mother of the child should have custody and that a child may be in danger even with the mother.
The crime of Lucio, who was raped with sex toys and beaten repeatedly by feminist activists, was recorded a year ago.
The mother obtained custody of the child after falsely denouncing her partner and using her position as a woman, mourners say.
Witnesses have revealed that the child suffered abuse for more than two years, was operated on five times in a hospital, while his father constantly fought for custody, which was denied to him because he was a man.
"Magdalena Espósito and her partner Abigail Páez were accused of homicide, both beat to death the 5-year-old child because he was a man," the relatives denounced.
Lucio's relatives say that the judge, despite the complaints and requests, ignored it and never investigated whether the child was in good hands with feminist activists.
In addition, blaming the judge as the intellectual plaintiff blames the teachers and medical personnel who operated on the minor on five occasions for fractures and never requested an investigation.
Family members have also blamed the government for promoting a pro-women movement that has sown hatred against men, reflected in the two women's mistreatment of the child because he was male.
The boy's father, who demanded that his son travel with him to another state, called for a protest on February 2 to demand life imprisonment.
"There are three killers here. Two are those who killed Lucio and one who gave him on a golden platter to be killed."
The case has taken on such relevance, not only because they are two feminist activists, but also because of the defense presented by a government employee Paula Litvachky, presenting a reform that allows mothers who could not abort to kill their children.
Women, they really reach depths of humanity thought unheard of.
It is consistent with lesbian abuse rates. There was that statistic about a child being raised by 2 moms and it had something like 23% abuse rate. Unfortunately it did not brake it down further between if the child was a boy or a girl. I have a strong suspicion that the percentage of boys abused by lesbian is a lot higher.
Moving away from single mother raised gangbangers killing each other, let's look at something more relevant.
Women have been the majority of those convicted of infanticide since the 90s, to the point that academic papers were written on why women liked to murder kids.
The answer is obvious - grown men can kick their asses, given half a chance. A baby can't.
No, it's just a fact. Single mother raised boys turn out violent because of the abuse inflicted on them as a proxy for the partner who left.
No, boys raised by single mothers are violent because a woman alone cannot control a boy. You're as dumb as it gets with your 'abuse' fantasies.
That's such a weird deflection.
It is? It's like being surprised that hospital employees are most likely to kill those admitted to hospitals and not malicious clowns.
It took me so long to find this. I posted it here over a year ago, under a strange title.
I thought surely you weren't talking about that. Because you claimed that they were investigating why 'women love killing kids'. This ain't it. And it shows that at least 40% of infants killed are girls, which I'm sure you'll claim is made up to hide the GENOCIDE against boys.
Because knives and guns equalize the field somewhat, especially if you're not expecting it.
lol, didn't our genius say that women should be stripped of their Second Amendment rights?
That just sounds like a woman-led academic study's excuse. Men are not naturally violent.
Wut? Are you denying human nature now? Are men more or less violent than women, by nature?
No, it's not.
Good counterargument, loony troon.
"There should be more research into whether women consider a male baby more other to them" sounds like a pretty strong indictment.
Considering that the numbers of women murdering infants (at least if it's their own baby) are tiny, it doesn't really say anything about women in general. There may be disturbed women, perhaps the victims of rape, who act out against the entire male sex like you do against the entire female sex.
I stand by it.
See, stripping people of their 2nd Amendment rights is not very popular here, so that is one of the reasons why you are so despised.
This is absolutely the result of a feminist orientation.
Letting gay or lesbian couples adopt children is a really bad idea, for the usual reasons. Lesbians, especially the ones driven by ideology, which is to say most lesbians, are massively confused about their relationships to children because they question the whole premise of womanhood and reject childbearing as something slavish and motherhood as "patriarchal."
Would they have done this had they adopted a girl? Would they even consider adopting a girl when it may be that their plan all along was to get hold of a helpless boy and torture him to death?
Evil is depressing. Totalitarian evil like feminism is horrifying, especially since there appears to be no stopping it.
You answered your own question.
Yes, because it's rhetorical.
Post Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Post Approved: This doesn't violate that rule.
"You can't tell people about feminists killing kids, it undermines our Nazi propaganda!" - ConPro.
All gender should be removed from custody fights and only thing that should be considered is who would raise the child better.
We'd probably see a huge increase in single dad's if we did that and lower child abuse if women couldn't pull the birth card for an advantage in courts.
No one here likes feminism, but if you want to claim that there was a connection between the ideology and the abuse, you have to demonstrate it.
You can't be for real. And you say I have crazy takes. Even the father of the child openly blames women's hatred.
Exclusively.
What, so you're going the BLM route pioneered by women? Any white who does anything to a black is motivated by racism?
I dunno man, Imp might be batshit but when all the info you have is "two feminist activist lesbians raped a boy in their care with dildos and beat him to death", starting with misandry as an initial presumed motive seems like a pretty fair assessment just on the balance of probability.
They're a pretty distinct group and being a feminist activist is a choice not an immutable characteristic so it is evidence of their character and mental state, hell within that subdemographic it's kind of ambiguous for many of them how much even being a lesbian isn't more of a conscientious objection than a sexual orientation. The onus at that point should probably be on proving that, contrary to the rest of their behaviour, that murder wasn't at least mostly motivated by man hating.
See, you brought reason and probability into it. And I would agree with that. It's rather suspicious, although abuse occurs everywhere and it's not proof positive. My issue with the Imp is that he claims to know with certainty, not probability, what the cause of this is.
And that this 'shows' that feminism is about murdering boys, or whatever. That's obviously false, because not only has a connection not been demonstrated, there are many feminists who raise boys, and in fact, spoil them to such an extent that they become rotten to the core.
Definitely. It sheds some light on their conduct, but it's by no means the end of the story. And I hate that it now sounds like I'm defending either these murderers or feminism in general.
And here again, I wouldn't even object to this statement. If you claimed to know with complete or near-complete certainty, on the other hand, I would take issue with that.
Wanna bet he will now furiously masturbate about Argentina's politics personally betraying him? After claiming that of Korea, Hungary, Lithuania, and basically half the countries of the world? Because he is personally connected to EVERY MALE EVER.
The TRAITOR PRESIDENT of Argentina is trying to make sure that his people don't go extinct, by bribing our Worse Halves into having children. Negotiating with TERRORISTS.
Men are denying themselves to women. WE ARE WINNING! Haha, womens! You're not getting this dick! Die mad about it, genocide pushers!
No, it's not him. It's his female handler. No man ever does bad, it's some secret woman handler doing it, he is just a puppet.
He BETRAYED me though. I do not forget. I do not forgive. When you throw in your lot with the women, Antonio will chase you to the gates of HELL! And we will prevail. How, I don't know, since men are only 49% of the population and many of them are TRAITORS, but I am sure of it! Maybe when the 90% death rate from the vaccine kicks in.
I don't know if he has a handler. Stop trying to make me sound ridiculous. He may just be bribed and blackmailed by women, like Ron DeSantis.
Ridiculous.
How are you going to win, when 51% by definition disagree with your hatred for women and many men are TRAITORS, Don Quixote?
Boris Johnson never existed?
The only good thing about Argentina is their football team. Everything else about that country is pure unadulterated radical feminist bullshit.
Also, I'm surprised you still have Internet connection considering the inflation in your tradcucked shithole.
More sweeping judgments about a country you have never even visited?
Budapest is by far more pleasant than any American city. And inflation results from energy prices, not from your delusions.
Argentina being feminist is not something I seriously have to justify. It's well known.
Hungary is not taking part in EU sanctions and still has high inflation, it has nothing to do with energy prices - it's a corrupt, incompetent leadership spending money they don't have.
It is known, Khaleesi.
Yes, because prices rise everywhere, genius.
Said the Murican. LOL!
Yes, it is known. Who the fuck is Khaleesi?
But why do they rise higher in Hungary than nearly all of their European peers except for the even more incompetent feminist dystopia of Lithuania, and the failed state of Moldova?
You are mad that a woman was murdered?
Greater dependence on Russian energy.
Dude, it's impossible to talk to you, and you've ceased being entertaining in this conversation, so I'm getting out.
Translated :
Women, they really reach depths of humanity thought unheard of.
It is consistent with lesbian abuse rates. There was that statistic about a child being raised by 2 moms and it had something like 23% abuse rate. Unfortunately it did not brake it down further between if the child was a boy or a girl. I have a strong suspicion that the percentage of boys abused by lesbian is a lot higher.
Most murders are committed by... men.
Men; they really reach depths of humanity thought unheard of (pls no R16 mods, I'm making fun of him).
Moving away from single mother raised gangbangers killing each other, let's look at something more relevant.
Women have been the majority of those convicted of infanticide since the 90s, to the point that academic papers were written on why women liked to murder kids.
The answer is obvious - grown men can kick their asses, given half a chance. A baby can't.
There you go again, your "Hitler's mother is to blame" excuse.
Doesn't really surprise me, since they do most of childcare.
Can you show me those academic papers?
So why are you so terrified of women murdering you? You claim to be 6'5" but you're deathly afraid of women.
No, it's just a fact. Single mother raised boys turn out violent because of the abuse inflicted on them as a proxy for the partner who left.
That's such a weird deflection.
It took me so long to find this. I posted it here over a year ago, under a strange title.
Because knives and guns equalize the field somewhat, especially if you're not expecting it.
No, boys raised by single mothers are violent because a woman alone cannot control a boy. You're as dumb as it gets with your 'abuse' fantasies.
It is? It's like being surprised that hospital employees are most likely to kill those admitted to hospitals and not malicious clowns.
I thought surely you weren't talking about that. Because you claimed that they were investigating why 'women love killing kids'. This ain't it. And it shows that at least 40% of infants killed are girls, which I'm sure you'll claim is made up to hide the GENOCIDE against boys.
lol, didn't our genius say that women should be stripped of their Second Amendment rights?
That just sounds like a woman-led academic study's excuse. Men are not naturally violent.
No, it's not.
"There should be more research into whether women consider a male baby more other to them" sounds like a pretty strong indictment.
I stand by it.
Wut? Are you denying human nature now? Are men more or less violent than women, by nature?
Good counterargument, loony troon.
Considering that the numbers of women murdering infants (at least if it's their own baby) are tiny, it doesn't really say anything about women in general. There may be disturbed women, perhaps the victims of rape, who act out against the entire male sex like you do against the entire female sex.
See, stripping people of their 2nd Amendment rights is not very popular here, so that is one of the reasons why you are so despised.