No fault divorce is de facto male fault divorce. You have to get rid of that all together, or at the very least purge the entire legal ecosystem that sustains family courts to eliminate the anti-male bias.
Establish default shared custody.
No, you go back to the old system where the man has custody. Princess might not be so cavalier about throwing her betabux in the garbage if she doesn't get to steal the kids and his assets.
Abolish Family Courts, bringing all cases under regular civil court.
That's actually a great idea. Despite all its bells and whistles marriage is a contract, so contract law should apply when it's broken. Right now one party (the woman) gets rewarded if the contract is broken regardless of who broke it or why they did so. It's little wonder that a woman's marriage vows are as credible as a junkie's pinky promise not to spend the rent money on heroin when her consequence for breaking those vows is cash and prizes.
No fault divorce is de facto male fault divorce. You have to get rid of that all together, or at the very least purge the entire legal ecosystem that sustains family courts to eliminate the anti-male bias.
No, you go back to the old system where the man has custody. Princess might not be so cavalier about throwing her betabux in the garbage if she doesn't get to steal the kids and his assets.
That's actually a great idea. Despite all its bells and whistles marriage is a contract, so contract law should apply when it's broken. Right now one party (the woman) gets rewarded if the contract is broken regardless of who broke it or why they did so. It's little wonder that a woman's marriage vows are as credible as a junkie's pinky promise not to spend the rent money on heroin when her consequence for breaking those vows is cash and prizes.