The Hill is worried how many men are rejecting starting a family in favor of living a good life.
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
There were rules to the game, men were the risk takers while women were the homemakers. Men had more 'power' decision wise and women's primary role was producing the next generation.
Don't come crying since you basically cheated the rules that men just refuse to play anymore. The really bad thing was that was a good deal for women and the feminists went 'but we want more with lower risks' so going back to that deal is going to be impossible thanks to bad faith.
Not impossible. It will simply require total capitulation, which women aren't going to offer.
Not until the house of cards come crashing down, that is.
it's never going to "crash down". there will be no day of reckoning.
day by day, you will wake up and they will gradually just be replaced by people who don't share these same values.
look at sweden and france. within the next 20 years, even if both countries completely shut off immigration, orthodox conservative muslims will be the majority. how long do swedish feminists think they'll have power when they wake up one day and the voting majority they imported believes that women are property?
and because it's the power of government, they will have no choice. london has already passed sharia in multiple forms. sweden/france are following too. denmark will be next. even israel is on track for jews to become a minority.
The deal would have slowly got worse for men regardless of women's actions. They just sped up the demise.
The deal was based off having a free maid, and as technology made that role practically worthless, even the traditional frame of marriage wouldn't have been worth it. The only time marriage was a gain was when you had to spend hours doing chores if you didn't have a wife. Now it's maximum an hour per week to clean, and thirty minutes to an hour to cook.
Right because that deal worked for thousands of years before that.
That doesn't disprove my argument.
It does.
Unfortunately true but the telling part was not that with this extra time did they try to find more ways to put back into the relationship whether as simple as a part time job, focusing on the home education of their kids than relying on the state or even self improved physically...
They decided to bitch and complain they didn't have more.
There's going to be a small percentage of women that do what I just said and they'll already be married, with kids not caring about any of this, but the feminists especially just showed their hand as soon as they had a bit more free time.