The Hill is worried how many men are rejecting starting a family in favor of living a good life.
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
The deal would have slowly got worse for men regardless of women's actions. They just sped up the demise.
The deal was based off having a free maid, and as technology made that role practically worthless, even the traditional frame of marriage wouldn't have been worth it. The only time marriage was a gain was when you had to spend hours doing chores if you didn't have a wife. Now it's maximum an hour per week to clean, and thirty minutes to an hour to cook.
Right because that deal worked for thousands of years before that.
That doesn't disprove my argument.
It does.
"We used leeches as medicine for hundreds of years! What the fuck are antibiotics?"
Unfortunately true but the telling part was not that with this extra time did they try to find more ways to put back into the relationship whether as simple as a part time job, focusing on the home education of their kids than relying on the state or even self improved physically...
They decided to bitch and complain they didn't have more.
There's going to be a small percentage of women that do what I just said and they'll already be married, with kids not caring about any of this, but the feminists especially just showed their hand as soon as they had a bit more free time.