Probably around the same age you start telling them they are evil by nature of existing, nothing they can do will ever be enough and there is no place for them in this world. Telling them they are invisibly privileged, while visibly privileging women- who then complain about being "disadvantaged".
I used to talk with this girl. She is responsive, so as non-austicularly as I could, I would add snazzy "ha gottem" info that she agrees with cosmetically, wait for a like or reply, and then veer hard into the ethnic portion of what she just agreed with lol. She is kinda racist and I dig it, and I just know in my bones she sees through "male feminist" soy bullshit and couldn't seriously date or marry one.
I have said it a lot and I'll say it again, women generally lack agency. A LOT of the militant neo-feminism as well as "somewhat agree"-feminism is just women letting you know they got cattitude. Spunk. Zeal and ego. Desperate for some non-feminized man and advertising themselves as a wild horse that he'd have to break. This is why men who behave as they are told turn into friendzone fodder and orbiters. As soon as you pass that shit test and open the door for them (as a man always should) they run through it.
Why would you do that? I don't think we need that unholy alliance.
A LOT of the militant neo-feminism as well as "somewhat agree"-feminism is just women letting you know they got cattitude. Spunk. Zeal and ego. Desperate for some non-feminized man and advertising themselves as a wild horse that he'd have to break. This is why men who behave as they are told turn into friendzone fodder and orbiters. As soon as you pass that shit test and open the door for them (as a man always should) they run through it.
This is your brain on "blame everything but women". You shack up with one of these freaks, you'll pay the price.
But to answer your question I saw her say something vaguely racist and I just wanted to push it as far as I can. People want to tip toe around the hard breaks between leftist ideology and reality and they should be pushed and prodded for it
She will say/believe anything if it dehumanizes men. But the fact that she replies does give me an interesting idea. I wonder if I could catch her out and make her prove my long-held theory that transgenderism is weaponized by feminism in accordance with the SCUM Manifesto.
Hallelujah! Praise the Lord! The one, the only, Impstradamus, has seen the light of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. He is saved from the clutches of the devil and has been delivered into our arms!
One thing is for sure, @ing feminist women on twitter would be more productive and probably more fun than pissing off ConPro. That forum is the definition of heels-dug-in on women. Their view reflects real life and they will only ever bully you over it. Militant feminists are actually wrong about the structure of the world. They are easy and fun.
Well if I had a time machine my point would have been a distinction between satan and marriage, but the technology and my body were not ready lol
I encourage you to mess with her on twitter. Idk if I sent it or deleted it, but I once wrote out a typically long comment to you to try and convince you to break out of the scored/win zone by arguing directly with these feminist girls on twitter.
Your energy is mighty, you are more intelligent than them, but most importantly- forgiven a few contextual nitpicks and specifications from my perspecitve- you are right about what you say. You can and should be kicking the internet asses of feminist women directly. I'm not just gushing when I say you could help change lives for the better.
You certainly know how I feel about the effects of "hate women" stuff on men. Idk if it is misogyny or whatever but I think the opposite is true when you bring it right to women spouting the bullshit we hate.
It is slightly wasted on ppl who either agree with you 99% anyway or who have dug their heel in with a hard "but" (like I am on the nature of women and the jewish social core of feminism). Women are more tractable, are easier to bait in arguments, and types of women who you hate the most are online basically talking pre-genocide shit about us whether we are there to blow them out or not.
They really need and cravewrangling from confident men. And I know how that sounds. But it really is as humorously simple, sexual, and stereotypical as you'd expect from a woman.
Whatever happened of that shooting that you were so sure the 'feds' (in Britain...) would blame on incels, Impstradamus? Why didn't you repost it like I asked you to?
There's a massive excess of women, considering their usefulness to society.
You're talking about people, not numbers. There's no excess, because every life is precious...unless it belongs to a feminist, in which case I hope they get cancer before they harm anyone.
Probably around the same age you start telling them they are evil by nature of existing, nothing they can do will ever be enough and there is no place for them in this world. Telling them they are invisibly privileged, while visibly privileging women- who then complain about being "disadvantaged".
Even if it's a joke, it's a very disturbing one. Especially with the context.
Send childless women over 35.
They failed at their primary function of contributing children to society and are a financial drain on the system.
Gets the shit beat out of her for being a cunt, can't understand why guys hate women so much.
I used to talk with this girl. She is responsive, so as non-austicularly as I could, I would add snazzy "ha gottem" info that she agrees with cosmetically, wait for a like or reply, and then veer hard into the ethnic portion of what she just agreed with lol. She is kinda racist and I dig it, and I just know in my bones she sees through "male feminist" soy bullshit and couldn't seriously date or marry one.
I have said it a lot and I'll say it again, women generally lack agency. A LOT of the militant neo-feminism as well as "somewhat agree"-feminism is just women letting you know they got cattitude. Spunk. Zeal and ego. Desperate for some non-feminized man and advertising themselves as a wild horse that he'd have to break. This is why men who behave as they are told turn into friendzone fodder and orbiters. As soon as you pass that shit test and open the door for them (as a man always should) they run through it.
Why would you do that? I don't think we need that unholy alliance.
This is your brain on "blame everything but women". You shack up with one of these freaks, you'll pay the price.
Marriage is literally the original holy aliance
But to answer your question I saw her say something vaguely racist and I just wanted to push it as far as I can. People want to tip toe around the hard breaks between leftist ideology and reality and they should be pushed and prodded for it
And Satan was originally an angel. Your point?
She will say/believe anything if it dehumanizes men. But the fact that she replies does give me an interesting idea. I wonder if I could catch her out and make her prove my long-held theory that transgenderism is weaponized by feminism in accordance with the SCUM Manifesto.
Hallelujah! Praise the Lord! The one, the only, Impstradamus, has seen the light of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. He is saved from the clutches of the devil and has been delivered into our arms!
BLESSED and Godpilled 🙌
One thing is for sure, @ing feminist women on twitter would be more productive and probably more fun than pissing off ConPro. That forum is the definition of heels-dug-in on women. Their view reflects real life and they will only ever bully you over it. Militant feminists are actually wrong about the structure of the world. They are easy and fun.
Well if I had a time machine my point would have been a distinction between satan and marriage, but the technology and my body were not ready lol
I encourage you to mess with her on twitter. Idk if I sent it or deleted it, but I once wrote out a typically long comment to you to try and convince you to break out of the scored/win zone by arguing directly with these feminist girls on twitter.
Your energy is mighty, you are more intelligent than them, but most importantly- forgiven a few contextual nitpicks and specifications from my perspecitve- you are right about what you say. You can and should be kicking the internet asses of feminist women directly. I'm not just gushing when I say you could help change lives for the better.
You certainly know how I feel about the effects of "hate women" stuff on men. Idk if it is misogyny or whatever but I think the opposite is true when you bring it right to women spouting the bullshit we hate.
It is slightly wasted on ppl who either agree with you 99% anyway or who have dug their heel in with a hard "but" (like I am on the nature of women and the jewish social core of feminism). Women are more tractable, are easier to bait in arguments, and types of women who you hate the most are online basically talking pre-genocide shit about us whether we are there to blow them out or not.
They really need and cravewrangling from confident men. And I know how that sounds. But it really is as humorously simple, sexual, and stereotypical as you'd expect from a woman.
Archive Link
The post she's reacting to - the boy in the video can't be over 3 years old.
Requesting that Reduxx is placed on the must-archive list.
What did I tell you about retarded titles?
Whatever happened of that shooting that you were so sure the 'feds' (in Britain...) would blame on incels, Impstradamus? Why didn't you repost it like I asked you to?
It's not a retarded title, that's literally what she's saying.
She's saying the quiet part out loud. "We only care about girls, boys can die for all we care."
Reduxx should be on the must-archive list like any other feminist propaganda network.
The guy is 5. When were they ever 'sent to war'?
I'm sure women like her would send them if society let them do it.
I can't think of anything mothers of 5-year-old boys would rather do than draft them and send them to war... says the guy who's never been outside.
See, you're thinking like TERFs are human. That's a mistake.
Didn't talk about "TERFs", troon. I talked about women. Also, GC are bad because they are human, not despite of it.
There's a massive excess of women, considering their usefulness to society.
You're talking about people, not numbers. There's no excess, because every life is precious...unless it belongs to a feminist, in which case I hope they get cancer before they harm anyone.
Which is bearing children.
Even that of a woman?!?!??!?!? What?!?!
Well, if that's their only use, let's send every woman who is infertile from birth or menopausal to the front lines of Ukraine.