It seems like to me they wanted him on board just to take him down. It was a complete setup.
That would be suicide. Maybe people are interested in making money, and not some weird conspiracy to 'take someone down' for literally no reason.
YouTube has been keeping the little person on the right from speaking and it’s time for everyone that is for free speech to move away from YouTube.
That is a bad idea as well. Like it or not, Youtube now has most users, and you want to tap into that, and not limit yourself to people who already agree with you - while at the same time trying to set up alternatives like Rumble and DW+.
This community has lost their mind on this issue; they're not thinking rationally. People hate the Daily Wire and "the Jews" so much that anyone who calls them out are automatically the good guys.
Crowder is clearly in the wrong here, and there's a good chance he's deliberately manufacturing this controversy for his own benefit and not just because he's "fighting for the next guy". He's not the hero people believe him to be.
on this issue; they're not thinking rationally. People hate the Daily Wire and "the Jews" so much that anyone who calls them out are automatically the good guys.
I do see people who don't hate "the Jews" siding with Crowder, so it's not just that. And I do lean more towards Crowder myself. But I also see that DW has a valid point as well (and I am a sub, so I don't hate DW).
Crowder is clearly in the wrong here
I'd say that anyone who says that anyone is "clearly in the wrong" is not thinking about it objectively. They both have valid points, because it is not an issue to which there is an easy solution.
I don’t see how anyone can do their research and not think Crowder is clearly in the wrong.
There’s zero evidence on Crowder’s side for his two big claims: 1) DW is cow-towing to big tech, and 2) DW is harming up-and-coming creators. No evidence. Zero. Please, someone show me the evidence, because I’ve thoroughly researched this topic and I haven’t found any whatsoever.
On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence to contradict these claims. DW employee testimonies. Testimonies of people who’ve worked with DW and Crowder. Testimonies of people who’ve work in the industry. Testimonies of people familiar with multi-million dollar contracts. It’s all there.
The people who are standing behind Crowder all seem to be smaller independent creators who’ve never seen a contract like this in their lives or those who have a bone to pick with DW.
Even if Crowder was correct about DW and “Big Con”, his behavior has been unprofessional and childish. At very least everyone on both sides seems to agree the recording of his friend without his knowledge was a bad move.
I cannot find a way Crowder comes out of this looking good.
There’s zero evidence on Crowder’s side for his two big claims: 1) DW is cow-towing to big tech, and 2) DW is harming up-and-coming creators. No evidence. Zero. Please, someone show me the evidence, because I’ve thoroughly researched this topic and I haven’t found any whatsoever.
This seems pretty obvious. If you penalize your own employees for being censored by Big Tech, you are punishing them, harming them, and kowtowing to Big Tech.
The issue is that DW is not creating this problem, but merely responding to it.
People who only care about money are incapable of comprehending that someone can care about something besides money. It's why Candace Owens lost her mind in total hysteria for 30 minutes on Tim Pool and why almost NOBODY is talking about the actual issue, but only talks about money.
And it's why like 95% of conservatives are worthless. You can just drive by their house and see their mountains of "Keeping up with the Joneses" expensive toys and understand that that's someone who has zero principles and will do anything for a shekel.
That would be suicide. Maybe people are interested in making money, and not some weird conspiracy to 'take someone down' for literally no reason.
That is a bad idea as well. Like it or not, Youtube now has most users, and you want to tap into that, and not limit yourself to people who already agree with you - while at the same time trying to set up alternatives like Rumble and DW+.
This community has lost their mind on this issue; they're not thinking rationally. People hate the Daily Wire and "the Jews" so much that anyone who calls them out are automatically the good guys.
Crowder is clearly in the wrong here, and there's a good chance he's deliberately manufacturing this controversy for his own benefit and not just because he's "fighting for the next guy". He's not the hero people believe him to be.
alwayswas.jpg.
I do see people who don't hate "the Jews" siding with Crowder, so it's not just that. And I do lean more towards Crowder myself. But I also see that DW has a valid point as well (and I am a sub, so I don't hate DW).
I'd say that anyone who says that anyone is "clearly in the wrong" is not thinking about it objectively. They both have valid points, because it is not an issue to which there is an easy solution.
I don’t see how anyone can do their research and not think Crowder is clearly in the wrong.
There’s zero evidence on Crowder’s side for his two big claims: 1) DW is cow-towing to big tech, and 2) DW is harming up-and-coming creators. No evidence. Zero. Please, someone show me the evidence, because I’ve thoroughly researched this topic and I haven’t found any whatsoever.
On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence to contradict these claims. DW employee testimonies. Testimonies of people who’ve worked with DW and Crowder. Testimonies of people who’ve work in the industry. Testimonies of people familiar with multi-million dollar contracts. It’s all there.
The people who are standing behind Crowder all seem to be smaller independent creators who’ve never seen a contract like this in their lives or those who have a bone to pick with DW.
Even if Crowder was correct about DW and “Big Con”, his behavior has been unprofessional and childish. At very least everyone on both sides seems to agree the recording of his friend without his knowledge was a bad move.
I cannot find a way Crowder comes out of this looking good.
This seems pretty obvious. If you penalize your own employees for being censored by Big Tech, you are punishing them, harming them, and kowtowing to Big Tech.
The issue is that DW is not creating this problem, but merely responding to it.
Everything is all about money and power.
People who only care about money are incapable of comprehending that someone can care about something besides money. It's why Candace Owens lost her mind in total hysteria for 30 minutes on Tim Pool and why almost NOBODY is talking about the actual issue, but only talks about money.
And it's why like 95% of conservatives are worthless. You can just drive by their house and see their mountains of "Keeping up with the Joneses" expensive toys and understand that that's someone who has zero principles and will do anything for a shekel.
Money and power are not always gone after in the same action. I would think ESG funding would have taught you that.
That’s about an obtuse statement as “all men care about is sex”
Power: Yes
Money: lolno, you fucking idiot.
If you have money, you have power.