The closest slightly related thing I can find is an obscure looking sites listing the overall deaths through 2022 in the United States. there is an obvious spike in 2020, and the rates grew even more in 2021 when COVID was less deadly but the shot was introduced, then in 2022 the rate falls a bit.
https://knoema.com/atlas/United-States-of-America/Death-rate
that was all I could find after 30 minutes of internet searching.
I believe USA is too close to Pfizer to have reliable data publicly available.
Dr Campbell has been showing excess deaths in UK and says they are mostly heart related. I think this is the video where he shows the actual website with the interactive data charts. I don't know if you can get access to it outside the UK or without being a doctor, but it might be worth a look.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/bhakdiburkhardt-pathology-results
more to come I'm sure. Or just tell your lost friend that's it's purely a coincidence. Let them go with that and leave them with their head stuck in the sand. Don't try awakening these types of people especially if they haven't figured it out by now.
The thing is that vaccine heart damage is not just men, it's everybody. It's just the men stress their hearts more so get actual symptoms out of the damage.
There was a study a few months ago where they used a high-sensitivity blood test (troponin) and found 1/30 people had sub-clinical heart damage. This test is not biased by self-reporting symptoms, but the actual number was 1/15 then they excluded half for having gone to the gym, for a jog, or other exercise and came up with 3x higher for women, but other studies showed no sex difference. Doctor talking about study when it was pre-published.
So you can see how easy it is to find for/against one sex just by a biased interpreting the data - you can have troponin from cardio and have vaccine heart damage. I wouldn't put much credence on it affecting men or women differently unless there is a huge amount of evidence for it.
a cursory internet search found these:
CDC seems to have stopped counting the prevalence of heart disease at 2019 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/topics/heart-disease-prevalence.htm
it's pretty easy to find MSM sources for overall death rates and heart deaths in 2020 compared to 2019, when COVID was prevalent but there was no shot. however I'm having a very difficult time finding anything about overall death rates, let her own heart attack rates or heart disease rates, past 2020. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/cdc-finds-deaths-heart-disease-diabetes-climbed-amid-covid-u-n1270260
The closest slightly related thing I can find is an obscure looking sites listing the overall deaths through 2022 in the United States. there is an obvious spike in 2020, and the rates grew even more in 2021 when COVID was less deadly but the shot was introduced, then in 2022 the rate falls a bit. https://knoema.com/atlas/United-States-of-America/Death-rate
that was all I could find after 30 minutes of internet searching.
I believe USA is too close to Pfizer to have reliable data publicly available.
Dr Campbell has been showing excess deaths in UK and says they are mostly heart related. I think this is the video where he shows the actual website with the interactive data charts. I don't know if you can get access to it outside the UK or without being a doctor, but it might be worth a look.
https://youtu.be/eYz-yelhkYE
Walensky is such a piece of shit. Her and all her female allies know exactly what they are doing.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/bhakdiburkhardt-pathology-results more to come I'm sure. Or just tell your lost friend that's it's purely a coincidence. Let them go with that and leave them with their head stuck in the sand. Don't try awakening these types of people especially if they haven't figured it out by now.
They don't want to know.
Are they genuinely skeptical, or are they being a "ah, hrm, can you cite some sources on that? No I mean real sources" fuckhead?
No, the person I am talking to is fairly conservative. They are open to the possibility, but without proof they are unsure about it.
The thing is that vaccine heart damage is not just men, it's everybody. It's just the men stress their hearts more so get actual symptoms out of the damage.
There was a study a few months ago where they used a high-sensitivity blood test (troponin) and found 1/30 people had sub-clinical heart damage. This test is not biased by self-reporting symptoms, but the actual number was 1/15 then they excluded half for having gone to the gym, for a jog, or other exercise and came up with 3x higher for women, but other studies showed no sex difference. Doctor talking about study when it was pre-published.
So you can see how easy it is to find for/against one sex just by a biased interpreting the data - you can have troponin from cardio and have vaccine heart damage. I wouldn't put much credence on it affecting men or women differently unless there is a huge amount of evidence for it.
3.5% if you test for it :
https://vinayprasadmdmph.substack.com/p/what-does-the-thailand-myocarditis?sd=pf