So you admit, that like all racialists, you're a fucking liar.
This is also why you can't be taken seriously on your racial pseudo-science, since it isn't based in actual neurology. It's especially worthless when your definition for "African" isn't based on anything genetic either, since you're never going to accept that genetic admixtures like American blacks, are far less African genetically than they've ever been. Don't worry fagetsu, I didn't forget about jews, turns out a bronze age tribal tradition doesn't understand that genetics are passed from both parents, not one, making purely racial genetic arguments about jews completely worthless. They're just as much of a mongrel as you are!
It's genetics when it fits your needs in a given conversation, and it's culture when it fits your needs in another.
Anyways, whatever biological distinctions that human genetic stratas have, we both know you're a liar trying to obfuscate for Socialism. Just like defending white women from having to account for their own degeneracy, you need to defend Socialism from the fact that it cultivates horrific behaviors worse than any genetic trait ever could. It's why you want to pretend that ye olde "Americanoids" are just genetically susceptible to alcoholism and that's the primary cause, not the fact that their own family run, Socialist, ethno-states have utterly destroyed their society and culture with corruption and dependency. You certainly don't want to admit that the progressive ethno-nationalism that indigenous peoples in US are attached to is horrifically self-destructive, and that the protection racket they build for themselves only enshrines their failures. If you ended up doing that, you'd have to admit your goal to do the same for white people would only result in more poverty, misery, and cultural genocide for white people; and that doesn't allow you to rationalize your power-fantasy.
So you admit, that like all racialists, you're a fucking liar.
This is also why you can't be taken seriously on your racial pseudo-science, since it isn't based in actual neurology. It's especially worthless when your definition for "African" isn't based on anything genetic either, since you're never going to accept that genetic admixtures like American blacks, are far less African genetically than they've ever been. Don't worry fagetsu, I didn't forget about jews, turns out a bronze age tribal tradition doesn't understand that genetics are passed from both parents, not one, making purely racial genetic arguments about jews completely worthless. They're just as much of a mongrel as you are!
It's genetics when it fits your needs in a given conversation, and it's culture when it fits your needs in another.
Anyways, whatever biological distinctions that human genetic stratas have, we both know you're a liar trying to obfuscate for Socialism. Just like defending white women from having to account for their own degeneracy, you need to defend Socialism from the fact that it cultivates horrific behaviors worse than any genetic trait ever could. It's why you want to pretend that ye olde "Americanoids" are just genetically susceptible to alcoholism and that's the primary cause, not the fact that their own family run, Socialist, ethno-states have utterly destroyed their society and culture with corruption and dependency. You certainly don't want to admit that the progressive ethno-nationalism that indigenous peoples in US are attached to is horrifically self-destructive, and that the protection racket they build for themselves only enshrines their failures. If you ended up doing that, you'd have to admit your goal to do the same for white people would only result in more poverty, misery, and cultural genocide for white people; and that doesn't allow you to rationalize your power-fantasy.