Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

41
Official : blacks can also be racist (but only against blacks… despite interracial crime rates) (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 3 years ago by NotAGlowy 3 years ago by NotAGlowy +41 / -0
50 comments download share
50 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
▲ 11 ▼
– CarmenOfSandiego 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Because you are yet again incapable of engaging in any discussion in good faith, as you yourself admit in the comment I replied to just above, let me show you how this is done without sounding like a ill-educated teenager who does little else but throw out baseless insults or call people names.

Your comment I replied to:

I'm not going to engage in good faith with people who use bots, false reports and copious handshakes.

My response highlighting when you engaged in similar ways:

Remember that time you use an alt to get around a ban?

This is me referencing an example, which you didn't respond to or try to defend in the slightest, where you have behaved in a way similar to those you complain about constantly. "Those" being a nebulous group of various labels which may or may not actually exist and who you often mix and match depending on how incensed you appear to be.

FYI given your posts today you appear to be more incensed than usual so whatever replies you've been getting clearly hit harder than you like them to.

Now onto the rest of this comment:

Don't flatter yourself, cuckold.

  1. Slur/Ad hominem. Baseless one that that - see the second point.

  2. You know nothing about me, my relationship status, or sexual activity/history/orientation.

You are again attempting to use buzzwords, smear tactics, ad hominem attacks, and whatever else you can think of because when it comes down to basics it's all you have. This is one of the main reasons you are repeatedly labelled as an SJW yourself because acting like this puts you in alignment with how they constantly behave towards others. Similarly it's often how women are described as behaving since it relies heavily on social force more than physical however that's partly an artefact of an online medium.

I'll never imitate the strategies of stormfaggot vermin, because they don't work.

As already mentioned you've already done that by using an alt while banned on your main account - which you literally admitted to in the very thread you posted 10 months ago because you just had to post something about Epic after shilling for them so much:

https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/141s6wAyJR/you-were-all-right-about-epic-in/

Said strategies certainly seem to work in getting you to post more unhinged than usual, as your posts ITT/today suggest.

Slightly related here's something you might have missed when you were last banned where it was roughly worked out, by me, that you've made over 25.5k posts and 1600 threads in the 2 and a half years you've been here on this forum. Keep in mind that only counts your activity on KiA2:

https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16ZXQjQK9o/x/c/4Toha1oqLri

Yes you've claimed to WFH however you still seem to spend far more time on this forum than probably anyone else and have very likely posted more than anyone else.

Most of it the same repeated lines over and over that you are either labelled as a shill for the groups you bring up time and again [like Epic, the Kering Foundation recently, and whoever else - "There is no such thing as bad publicity" and you certainly give these groups far more attention here than they would otherwise receive], or you end up labelled as an SJW/troon/Jew/etc because you behave in ways that match those groups or take stances that either deflect or defend the others.

SJW

See my above explanation.

Troon

You are obsessed with TERFs far more than any non troon has any sensible right to be and in particular jump hard on the bandwagon when it comes to JK Rowling.

Jew

As briefly mentioned ITT and others if/when someone suggests that Jews [or any other group apart from Jews and women] might be something to consider you deflect away from said groups either to avoid attention being cast on them [which gets reasoned as you being part of said group] or possibly just to try and bring things back around to your own personal bugbear that lives rent free inside your head.

Precisely what this bugbear is does vary however as while it is 'women' most of the time you also repeatedly bring up: cucks/cuckold[s], stormfags, stormcucks, tradcucks, ConPro, TERFs, and probably others.

You bring these up more than anyone else on the board and pretty much always as a means to explain away why you are getting downvoted to oblivion [again] rather than attempting to accept it's because what you are saying/posting isn't anywhere near as popular as you might think it is.

You even did this as recently as 3 days ago here:

https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16ZqUDZk8K/x/c/4Toj8oirQhB

Where are the TERFs that the right jumped in bed with last year?

Oh, they got what they wanted and don't care.

And holy shit, dude, that post is only 3 days ago and yet it's on page 5 of your recent post history. You've made 118 posts since then some of which give even lead balloons a run for their money in how badly they went down.

Your edit of that post:

This comment was +9/-0 when I logged out, now +9/-17. Either TERFs are here or the stormfags are back to botting my comments.

Or maybe, just maybe the other 23 downvotes are from users who find your "grave-dancing" in very poor taste just so you can yet again try and score points against "TERFs" and others.

They just give the illusion of support,

In contrast to your own stated interests which involve an an-natalist approach so extreme it can only end in the extinction of the human race. All to "own the libs wammenz".

everyone still laughs at you.

Again, you know nothing about me save what little I post here and you might try and interpret from those posts, but your posting history at this point suggests that's irrelevant because you've acted like this towards countless others on this board for years now and keep turning around wondering why nobody takes your side.

Spoiler: It's because you don't have a side.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– TheKidsAreAltRight 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

TL;DR please, stormfag. I can't be bothered to deal with you shilling for your pedophilic feminist masters

Ironic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– CarmenOfSandiego 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

TL;DR

More the fool you since your entire post goes on to do exactly what I said you would.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy