Why do they call it Naarm? What I do t get about these people who talk about being on stolen land is that they are more than free to find some indigenous people and give up her property to them. If she truly is down for the cause. Most places you go in the world will be on land where groups were conquered numerous times in the past thousands of years. Whenever I see this virtue signaling I just ask them why they don’t give up their land.
In general with these people, as Tony says - if you find something that requires actual effort, from them, or actually lowering their “living standards”, they simply will not do it…
It’s partly why actual remote Indigenous communities hate them so much: because they don’t fucking DO anything that actually helps real, disadvantaged Abos. They just squeal and grunt and make woke pronouncements like this, instead…
It’s why they all live in Melbourne, where the “Indigenous” are all whiteys who only “found out” they had “an Aboriginal grandma” when they were in their 20s…
It’s why they shit on Sydney, Perth and Brisbane in particular, where significant concentrations of full-bloods live in ghettos, because those Aboriginals have almost nothing in common with the kinds of “Aboriginals” this woman talks about.
It’s like fucking Kamala (or J Lo) claiming to have commonality with Shaniqua from the block, or Mary from Trench Town (Jamaica). It’s complete performative bullshit, but they either lack the self-awareness to know, or they don’t even care…
I know many, many people like this. Nearly all of them are unmarried, childless women under 35, or “queer” beta males. This is just another box of bullshit to tick, for them…
And of course people like that make up 90% of the voter base for the Greens, in Australia, and in fact in most countries (also “the squad”, in the US). Of course…
Sorry for the rant. This just… Really annoys me, as someone who has seen this far too often, for far too long…
Why do they call it Naarm? What I do t get about these people who talk about being on stolen land is that they are more than free to find some indigenous people and give up her property to them. If she truly is down for the cause. Most places you go in the world will be on land where groups were conquered numerous times in the past thousands of years. Whenever I see this virtue signaling I just ask them why they don’t give up their land.
In general with these people, as Tony says - if you find something that requires actual effort, from them, or actually lowering their “living standards”, they simply will not do it…
It’s partly why actual remote Indigenous communities hate them so much: because they don’t fucking DO anything that actually helps real, disadvantaged Abos. They just squeal and grunt and make woke pronouncements like this, instead…
It’s why they all live in Melbourne, where the “Indigenous” are all whiteys who only “found out” they had “an Aboriginal grandma” when they were in their 20s…
It’s why they shit on Sydney, Perth and Brisbane in particular, where significant concentrations of full-bloods live in ghettos, because those Aboriginals have almost nothing in common with the kinds of “Aboriginals” this woman talks about.
It’s like fucking Kamala (or J Lo) claiming to have commonality with Shaniqua from the block, or Mary from Trench Town (Jamaica). It’s complete performative bullshit, but they either lack the self-awareness to know, or they don’t even care…
I know many, many people like this. Nearly all of them are unmarried, childless women under 35, or “queer” beta males. This is just another box of bullshit to tick, for them…
And of course people like that make up 90% of the voter base for the Greens, in Australia, and in fact in most countries (also “the squad”, in the US). Of course…
Sorry for the rant. This just… Really annoys me, as someone who has seen this far too often, for far too long…
I totally understand the rant. I feel the same way.
She is. But her cause if virtue-signaling, not helping them benighted natives.