I don't think so. I think it is possible to win an election if you reduce the enemy's control of the narrative.

You'll be able to "win an election", but you will not be able to get anything done, as we saw with Trump. And why is that?

The difference between polling and results in the mid-terms is easily explained by over-optimism over what women's vote would come out as.

Say, did you ever explain why you claimed that "women stabbed the nation in the back", even though their vote swung towards the GOP?

Sure, AZ is corrupt as shit, Kari Lake might have squeaked out a win in reality, but I don't think that the huge difference in what was expected and what happened is much more than hubris coming back to bite.

Considering that GOP underperformed almost everywhere, except NY and CA, I don't think there was any AZ-specific fraud. But then again, I think they legally rigged the election as in 2020.

The whole focus on TERF bullshit, running women in most seats, didn't do anything for the vote totals because they don't understand women. Whoever promises them hatred is who they vote for. Look at how women are a stable voting bloc for the UK Conservatives.

One wonders how you shoehorn all your betes noires into the conversation.

Rishi the latest with the absurd support of Braverman's ridiculous "keep women safe" bullshit, including such gems as making it illegal to walk too close.

Didn't I tell you that you would turn on Rishi almost instantly? I guess now you can use his wife or whoever she was as 'puppeteering' him.

That security might change in the future because Labour are heavily doubling down on encouraging women's hatred.

Say, you claim that "women" are against troons, and yet Labour is so pro-troon that it refuses to say that only women have a cervix. So by your standards, Labour is heroically standing against the woman menace.