Why?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
When I was younger, there was a lot of talk about striking down ordinances that prohibited women from being seen in public topless.
To the shitlib me at the time, it sounded great because anything that leads to me seeing more titties in my day to day was positive.
But now I realize it's wasn't actually about fairness but more about socially eliminating the obvious biological differences between the two sexes.
Also you don't actually want to see the titties on anybody who would actually go out on a slutwalk like that.
Not to mention that there are places where women CAN go topless, like New York City and possibly the entire state, yet they don't. Getting worked up about something that's allegedly restricting women from doing something that they wouldn't do anyway is kind of evidence that they ran out of actual issues a while ago.
I alsways found the "there is nothing sexual about breasts you creep, it's to feed babies, men have breasts too" lies very annoying gaslighting.
Developped breasts is a secondary sexual characteristic of human females. It is sexual.
Feminists campaigning to "free the nipple" never tried to reform law to make it so groping a woman's breast gets downgraded to assault "because there is nothing sexual".